Traditional vs. Energetic and Perchlorate vs. "Green": A Comparative Study of the Choice of Binders and Oxidising Agents

被引:2
|
作者
Lysien, Kinga [1 ]
Waskiewicz, Sylwia [1 ]
Stolarczyk, Agnieszka [1 ]
Mielanczyk, Anna [1 ]
Zakusylo, Roman [2 ]
Jarosz, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Tech Univ, Dept Phys Chem & Technol Polymers, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
[2] Sumy State Univ, Shostka Inst, UA-41100 Shostka, Ukraine
来源
MOLECULES | 2023年 / 28卷 / 15期
关键词
solid propellant; perchlorate; hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene; glycidyl azide polymer green; oxidising agent; phase-stabilised ammonium nitrate; DSC; THERMAL-DECOMPOSITION; PROPELLANT; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.3390/molecules28155787
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to compare rocket propellants containing a traditional binder (hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene) and an energetic binder (glycidyl azide polymer), as well as a perchlorate oxidising agent and a "green" one, i.e., ammonium perchlorate and phase-stabilised ammonium nitrate. We have outlined the effects of individual substances on the sensitivity parameters and decomposition temperature of the produced solid propellants. The linear combustion velocity was determined using electrical methods. Heats of combustion for the propellant samples and the thermal decomposition features of the utilised binders were investigated via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Activation energy values for the energetic decomposition of the propellants were determined via the Kissinger method, based on DSC measurements at varied heating rates.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRADITIONAL VS. COGNITIVE AGENT SIMULATION
    Kim, Deuk-Woo
    Kim, Jong-Hun
    Park, Sang-Lin
    Kim, Ki-Cheol
    Park, Cheol-Soo
    BUILDING SIMULATION 2013: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION ASSOCIATION, 2013, : 2020 - 2027
  • [32] The Traditional Engineer vs. The Innovative Engineeer
    Ferguson, Daniel Michael
    Purzer, Senay
    Ohland, Matthew W.
    Jablokow, Kathryn
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [33] Titanium vs. traditional coiled tubing
    Christie, M.
    Gavin, B.
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1997, 49 (06): : 618 - 619
  • [34] Patient choice vs. finite resources
    Kartha, V
    Barker, K
    Mackenzie, I
    ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (11) : 1149 - 1149
  • [35] Promoter choice: Selection vs. rejection
    Mehrotra, Rajesh
    Loake, Gary
    Mehrotra, Sandhya
    GENE REPORTS, 2018, 13 : 38 - 41
  • [36] RISK CHOICE: INTENTION VS. ACTION
    Kornienko, Dmitry S.
    Baleva, Milena V.
    Yachmeneva, Nadezhda P.
    EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2023, 16 (01): : 87 - 100
  • [37] Comparative study of patch test using traditional method vs. prior skin abrading
    Fernandes, M. F. M.
    de Mello, J. F.
    Pires, M. C.
    Vizeu, M. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2007, 21 (10) : 1351 - 1359
  • [38] Winemaking envelopes energy efficiency: new technologies vs. traditional comparative study cases
    Ramos, A., I
    ENTRE CIENCIA E INGENIERIA, 2022, 16 (31): : 25 - 32
  • [39] A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Education System Vs. e-Learning
    Gowda, Ramya S.
    Suma, V
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE MECHANISMS FOR INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS (ICIMIA), 2017, : 567 - 571
  • [40] Wise use vs. green extremism
    Timber Producer, 2000, (03):