Board meeting, promoter CEO and firm performance: Evidence from India

被引:4
|
作者
Sahoo, Minati [1 ]
Srivastava, Kailash B. L. [2 ]
Gupta, Neeraj [3 ]
Mittal, Sachin Kumar [3 ]
Bakhshi, Priti [4 ]
Agarwal, Tarun [5 ]
机构
[1] Nl Dalmia Inst Management Studies & Res, HR & OB, Mumbai, India
[2] IIT Kharagpur, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, HR & OB, kharagpur, India
[3] Nl Dalmia Inst Management Studies & Res, Finance, Mumbai, India
[4] SP Jain Sch Global Management, Finance, Mumbai, India
[5] Kirloskar Inst Adv Management Studies, Pune, India
来源
COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE | 2023年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Board meeting; clause; 49; corporate governance; promoter CEO; firm performance; FREE CASH FLOW; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; AGENCY COSTS; LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE; BANK PERFORMANCE; FAMILY OWNERSHIP; PANEL-DATA; DIRECTORS;
D O I
10.1080/23322039.2023.2175465
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The study examined the relationship between board characteristics and firm performance and the moderating effects of firm size, the board size, and firm age between board characteristics and firm performance. This study considers the legal reforms implemented after the Indian Companies Act 2013. Data from 113 firms with 904 observations from 2012-13 to 2019-20 were analyzed using the fixed panel data estimation approach. A subsample analysis is employed, dividing the data by firm size, the board size, and firm age to test the robustness of the results. The results show that the board size, female director, Promoter CEOs, meeting frequencies, and attendance rate positively affect firm performance. At the same time, the impact of the independent directors and busy CEO has a negative impact on performance. Male CEOs are beneficial for firm performance. The study adds to the literature by identifying critical board characteristics in light of ongoing regulatory reform in emerging economies like India. It has implications for regulators and policymakers who are entrusted with the framing of corporate governance policies.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Board Characteristics, Firm Profitability and Earnings Management: Evidence from India
    Kapoor, Nimisha
    Goel, Sandeep
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 27 (02) : 180 - 194
  • [22] Firm Performance and CEO Pay: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing
    Ghosh, Saibal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2010, 19 (02): : 137 - 147
  • [23] CEO Education and Firm Performance: Evidence from Corporate Universities
    Nguyen, Hai Long
    Fan, Pengda
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [24] CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from Hong Kong
    Lam, Tin Yan
    Lee, Shu Kam
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2008, 8 (03): : 299 - +
  • [25] Supervisory quality of board and firm performance: a perspective of board meeting attendance
    Lin, Ying-fen
    Yeh, Yaying Mary Chou
    Yang, Feng-ming
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2014, 25 (3-4) : 264 - 279
  • [26] The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK
    Guest, Paul M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 15 (04): : 385 - 404
  • [27] Board diversity and firm performance: evidence from the UK SMEs
    Shehata, Nermeen
    Salhin, Ahmed
    El-Helaly, Moataz
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (48) : 4817 - 4832
  • [28] BOARD CAPITAL EFFECT ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
    Kontesa, Maria
    Lako, Andreas
    Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2020, 21 (01): : 491 - 506
  • [29] The Impact of Promoter Shareholding on Firm Value and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Firms in India
    Rao, K. T. Vigneswara
    Parameshwar, H. S.
    Ajay, KothaBhima
    Aradhyula, Aditya Yadav
    [J]. PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 11 (05): : 103 - 110
  • [30] Electricity Cost and Firm Performance: Evidence from India
    Abeberese, Ama Baafra
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2017, 99 (05) : 839 - 852