Spatial variations and influencing factors of Cumulative Health Deficit Index of elderly in China

被引:1
|
作者
Xiang, Liuchun [1 ]
Yamada, Masaaki [3 ]
Feng, Wenmeng [2 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Nie, Haisong [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, United Grad Sch Agr Sci, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
[2] Dev Res Ctr State Council, Beijing 100010, Peoples R China
[3] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Inst Agr, Div Int Environm & Agr Sci, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
关键词
Elderly; Cumulative Health Deficit Index; CHDI; Geodetector; Spatial variation; FRAILTY INDEX; DIFFERENTIATION; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s41043-023-00403-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith the acceleration of aging and urbanization, how to make cities more age-friendly has become a hot topic. During the long-term demographic transition, the health of the elderly has become an important consideration in urban planning and management. The health of the elderly is a complex issue. However, previous studies have mainly focused on the health defects related to disease incidence, loss of function, mortality, etc., yet a comprehensive evaluation of health status is lacking. The Cumulative Health Deficit Index (CHDI) is a composite index that combines psychological and physiological indicators. Health deficits can reduce the quality of life of the elderly and increase the burden on families, cities and even society, so it is indispensable to understand the individual factors and regional factors that affect CHDI. The research on the spatial differentiation of CHDI and its driving factors can provide scientific geographic information basis for the construction of age-friendly cities and healthy city planning. It also has great significance in narrowing the differences in the health status among regions and reducing the overall burden of the country.MethodsThis research analyzed a nationwide dataset, the China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey in 2018 conducted by the Renmin University of China, which contained 11,418 elderly aged 60 years and older from 28 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions that represent 95% of the population in mainland China. The Cumulative Health Deficit Index (CHDI) was the first time constructed using the entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate the health status of the elderly. Entropy-TOPSIS is to quantify the importance of each indicator by calculating the entropy value to improve the reliability and accuracy of the results and avoid the influence of previous researchers' subjective assignments and model assumptions on the results. The selected variables include physical health 27 indicators (self-rated health, basic mobility assessment, daily activity ability, disease and treatment) and mental health 36 indicators (cognitive ability, depression and loneliness, social adjustment, and filial piety concept). The research used the Geodetector methods (factor detection and interaction detection) that combined individual and regional indicators to analyze the spatial variation characters and reveal the driving factors of CHDI.ResultsThe weight of mental health indicators (75.73) is three times that of physical health indicators (24.27), and its composition formula is: CHDI value = (14.77% disease and treatment + 5.54% daily activity ability + 2.14% health self-assessment + 1.81% basic mobility assessment) + (33.37% depression and loneliness + 25.21% cognitive ability + 12.46% social adjustment + 4.7% filial piety). Individual CHDI was more associated with age and was more evident in females than males. CHDI average values show the distribution trend of Hu Line (HL) in the geographic information graph that the CHDI in West HL regions are lower than in the East HL regions. The highest CHDI cities are in Shanxi, Jiangsu, and Hubei, whereas the lowest CHDI cities are Inner Mongolia, Hunan and Anhui. The geographical distribution maps of the 5-levels of CHDI levels show very different CHDI classification levels among the elderly in the same region. Further, the top three influential factors are personal income, empty nest, aged 80+, and regional factors also obviously affect CHDI values, such as the proportion participating in insurance, population density, and GDP. The two different factors in individual and regional factors all show a two-factor interaction effect, and enhancement or nonlinear enhancement. The top three ranks are personal income & AND; quality of air (0.94), personal income & AND; GDP (0.94), and personal income & AND; urbanization rate (0.87).ConclusionsCHDI is a subjective and objective comprehensive index, and mental indicators are primary factors. Thus attaching importance to the psychological care of the elderly is the key to building a healthy aging society. The large individual heterogeneity and spatial differentiation of CHDI in the elderly were demonstrated by map visualization. The analysis of the influencing factors of CHDI by the Geodetector method proves that spatial differentiation is mainly affected by individual economic and social security factors, but also by the interaction with regional factors such as quality of air, GDP, and urbanization rate. This research fills a gap in the elderly health status in the field of spatial geography. The results can provide empirical evidence for policymakers to take measures according to local conditions to improve the health status of the elderly according to regional differences in physical and mental conditions. It also plays a guiding role for the country in balancing regional economic development, promoting healthy and sustainable urban development, and creating age-friendly cities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Cold Storage in China
    Jinfeng Li
    Haicheng Xu
    Wanwan Liu
    Dongfang Wang
    Shuang Zhou
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30 : 505 - 515
  • [42] Factors influencing the spatial distribution of cystic echinococcosis in Tibet, China
    Ma, Tian
    Jiang, Dong
    Quzhen, Gongsang
    Xue, Chuizhao
    Han, Shuai
    Wu, Weiping
    Zheng, Canjun
    Ding, Fangyu
    Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 754
  • [43] Spatial distribution of iodine in the pedosphere of China and its influencing factors
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Xueqiu
    Zhang, Bimin
    Chi, Qinghua
    Liu, Qingqing
    Zhou, Jian
    Cheng, Xinbin
    Nie, Lanshi
    Liu, Hanliang
    Liu, Dongsheng
    Yan, Taotao
    Li, Longxue
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2023, 248
  • [44] Small water bodies in China: Spatial distribution and influencing factors
    Mingquan LV
    Shengjun WU
    Maohua MA
    Ping HUANG
    Zhaofei WEN
    Jilong CHEN
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65 (08) : 1431 - 1448
  • [45] Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Cold Storage in China
    LI Jinfeng
    XU Haicheng
    LIU Wanwan
    WANG Dongfang
    ZHOU Shuang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, (03) : 505 - 515
  • [46] Spatial Correlation and Influencing Factors of Environmental Regulation Intensity in China
    Feng, Lili
    Shao, Jingchen
    Wang, Lin
    Zhou, Wenjun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [47] Small water bodies in China: Spatial distribution and influencing factors
    Lv, Mingquan
    Wu, Shengjun
    Ma, Maohua
    Huang, Ping
    Wen, Zhaofei
    Chen, Jilong
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 65 (08) : 1431 - 1448
  • [48] China's Spatial Economic Network and Its Influencing Factors
    Yu, Guihai
    He, Deyan
    Lin, Wenlong
    Wu, Qiuhua
    Xiao, Jianxiong
    Lei, Xiaofang
    Xie, Zhongqun
    Wu, Renjie
    COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [49] Spatial pattern of tourist attractions and its influencing factors in China
    Wang, Ting
    Wang, Lu
    Ning, Zhi-Zhong
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 65 (02) : 327 - 344
  • [50] Spatial Measurements and Influencing Factors of Comprehensive Human Development in China
    Li, Zaijun
    Zheng, Xiang
    Sarwar, Suleman
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)