Validity and reliability study of the Khalfa's hyperacusis questionnaire with using ULL in tinnitus patients

被引:3
|
作者
Altin, Busra [1 ]
Kamisli, Gurbet Ipek Sahin [2 ]
Aksoy, Songul [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Audiol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Audiol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Lokman Hekim Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Audiol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Hyperacusis; Questionnaire; Tinnitus; Loudness; Turkish; UNCOMFORTABLE LOUDNESS LEVELS; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACH; SOUND; ASSOCIATION; TOLERANCE; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-022-07727-7
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Khalfa's hyperacusis questionnaire (HQ) in Turkish tinnitus patients with hyperacusis using uncomfortable loudness levels (ULLs) and to determine a cutoff score for tinnitus patients specifically. Materials and methods One hundred and forty subjects with a mean age +/- SD of 45.27 +/- 14.43 years ranging from 18 to 75 participated in the study. HQ and ULLs were used as measures of hyperacusis. The participants were divided into two groups due to ULLs <= 90 dB in one or both ears (Group 1) and 56 participants have ULLs > 90 dB (Group 2). Results The mean HQ score of the participants was 19.55 +/- 7.18 points, Group 1 (n = 84) HQ mean score was 21.97 +/- 7.08, and Group 2 (n = 56) 15.91 +/- 5.56 points, and the cutoff point was found 16.50. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in total HQ (p < 0.001), attention, social, and emotional subscales of HQ. Conclusions Hyperacusis questionnaire using with ULLs is a precise tool for the steps of identifying, categorizing, and managing the hyperacusis in patients with tinnitus. However, the effect of the tinnitus on hyperacusis should be considered, because it causes additional problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1485 / 1492
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Study Process Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, M. Betul
    Orhan, Feza
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2011, 36 (159): : 69 - 83
  • [32] Turkish adaptation of Ghosting Questionnaire: validity and reliability study
    Ayşe Ece Atalar
    Nurdan Çolakoğlu
    Zeynep Bağişlioğlu
    Achraf Ammar
    Haitham Jahrami
    BMC Psychology, 13 (1)
  • [33] An Arabic version of the study process questionnaire: Reliability and validity
    Albaili, MA
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 77 (03) : 1083 - 1089
  • [34] Sexual risk cognitions questionnaire: A reliability and validity study
    Shah, D
    Thornton, S
    Burgess, AP
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 1997, 9 (04): : 471 - 480
  • [35] The Psychiatric Care Satisfaction Questionnaire: a reliability and validity study
    D. A. Barker
    M. W. Orrell
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1999, 34 : 111 - 116
  • [36] The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire
    Ozdemir, Nurgul
    Buzlu, Sevim
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2020, 11 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [37] TEACHER STRESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY IN ITALY
    Zurlo, Maria Clelia
    Pes, Daniela
    Capasso, Roberto
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2013, 113 (02) : 490 - 517
  • [38] Emotion Regulation Questionnaire A validity and reliability study in Greece
    Bebetsos, E.
    Konstantinidis, C.
    Filippou, F.
    Bebetsos, G.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (04): : 523 - 527
  • [39] A Validity and Reliability Study of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
    Erturan Ilker, Gokce
    Arslan, Yunus
    Demirhan, Giyasettin
    KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI, 2014, 14 (03): : 829 - 833
  • [40] The psychiatric care satisfaction questionnaire: a reliability and validity study
    Barker, DA
    Orrell, MW
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (02) : 111 - 116