A volatile mind? Experimental evidence on dealers' biases and market volatility

被引:0
|
作者
Trivedi, Smita Roy [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Bank Management, Money Int Banking & Finance Area Grp, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Behavioral finance; Simulated trading game experiment; Heuristics; C53; E71; G41; OVERCONFIDENCE;
D O I
10.1108/RBF-10-2021-0223
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose The study tests the hypothesis that following the arrival of news in the forex market, the trader/dealers demonstrate two kinds of biases which makes markets volatile: "Recurrence bias," the belief that news which formerly led to volatility, will again generate volatility (i.e. volatility is recurring), and "Volatility Perception Bias," the belief that increased volatility following the arrival of a news would persist. Design/methodology/approach The author uses a preliminary survey and three simulated trading game experiments involving professional foreign exchange dealers to understand these heuristic-led biases and the biases' impact on market volatility. Findings The paper finds evidence supporting the presence of both "Recurrence Bias" and "Volatility Perception Bias" and a statistically significant, positive impact of participant biases' on market heterogeneity. Originality/value The paper makes two important contributions: first, the use of simulated trading game experiment involving professional dealers and second, the incorporation of dealers' biases and heuristics in understanding forex volatility.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 569
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Volatility of the stock market and the Asian crisis - International evidence of asymmetries
    Johnson, CA
    Soriano, FA
    TRIMESTRE ECONOMICO, 2004, 71 (282): : 355 - 388
  • [42] Short selling and intraday volatility: evidence from the Chinese market
    Zhang, Yongjie
    Liu, Keming
    Shen, Dehua
    Zhang, Wei
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4 : 1 - 9
  • [43] Country-fund discounts and risk: Evidence from stock market volatility and macroeconomic volatility
    Chiang, Thomas C.
    Kim, Doseong
    Lee, Euiseong
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2006, 58 (04) : 303 - 322
  • [44] Market volatility, liquidity shocks, and stock returns: Worldwide evidence
    Ma, Rui
    Anderson, Hamish D.
    Marshall, Ben R.
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2018, 49 : 164 - 199
  • [45] Evidence on aggregate volatility risk premium for the French stock market
    Zaghouani Chakroun, Amal
    Mezzez Hmaied, Dorra
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2019, 46 (01) : 72 - 91
  • [46] Determinants of idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from the Indian stock market
    Kumari, Jyoti
    Mahakud, Jitendra
    Hiremath, Gourishankar S.
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 41 : 172 - 184
  • [47] Risk Volatility Measurement: Evidence from Indonesian Stock Market
    Rahmi, Mustika
    Azma, Nurul
    Muttaqin, Aminullah Achmad
    Jazil, Thuba
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2016, 3 (03): : 57 - 65
  • [48] Variance and skew risk premiums for the volatility market: The VIX evidence
    Da Fonseca, Jose
    Xu, Yahua
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2019, 39 (03) : 302 - 321
  • [49] Structural changes in volatility and stock market development: Evidence for Spain
    Eizaguirre, JC
    Biscarri, JG
    Hidalgo, FPD
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2004, 28 (07) : 1745 - 1773
  • [50] Public reaction to stock market volatility: evidence from the ATUS
    Payne, Patrick
    Browning, Christopher
    Kalenkoski, Charlene M.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 23 (17) : 1197 - 1200