Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients at 30 days: a propensity score matching study

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chen [1 ]
Jiang, Yefan [2 ]
Wang, Qingpeng [3 ]
Wang, Dashuai [1 ]
Jiang, Xionggang [1 ]
Dong, Nianguo [1 ]
Chen, Si [1 ]
Chen, Xinzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary artery bypass grafting; off-pump; on-pump; elderly; propensity score matching; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; MORTALITY; REVASCULARIZATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TERM;
D O I
10.1093/postmj/qgad120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG). This study was to determine whether such high-risk population would benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients aged 65 years or older who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for the first time in Wuhan Union Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021. We used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the ONCABG and OPCABG groups. Morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery were compared between the two groups. All operations were performed by experienced cardiac surgeons.Results A total of 511 patients (ONCABG 202, OPCABG 309) were included. After 1:1 matching, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (ONCABG 173, OPCABG 173). The OPCABG group had higher rate of incomplete revascularization (13.9% vs. 6.9%; P = .035) than the ONCABG group. However, OPCABG reduced the risk of postoperative renal insufficiency (15.0% vs. 30.1%; P = .001) and reoperation for bleeding (0.0% vs. 3.5%; P = .030). There were no significant differences in early postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other outcomes between the two groups.Conclusions OPCABG is an alternative revascularization method for elderly patients. It reduces the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding. What is already known on this topic Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. What this study adds Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding in elderly patients. How this study might affect research, practice or policy The study showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is an alternative surgical method for revascularization in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. It can provide data support for clinicians to select off-pump procedure for elderly patients and facilitate clinical decision-making, outcome assessment, and quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OFF-PUMP VERSUS ON-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: WHO BENEFITS?
    Pawliszak, Wojciech
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Anisimowicz, Lech
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (06): : 1666 - 1668
  • [22] Results of On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reply
    Chu, Danny
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (01): : 358 - 359
  • [23] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a surreal controversy?
    Kundu A.
    Yadava O.P.
    Taggart D.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (Suppl 3) : 266 - 271
  • [24] On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main stem disease: A propensity score analysis
    Murzi, Michele
    Caputo, Massimo
    Aresu, Giuseppe
    Duggan, Simon
    Miceli, Antonio
    Glauber, Mattia
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (06): : 1382 - 1388
  • [25] On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in High-Risk Patients A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Ji, Qiang
    Mei, YunQing
    Wang, Xisheng
    Ding, Wenjun
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 484 - 488
  • [26] Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting
    Sun, Xiaoning
    Wang, Chunsheng
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (02): : 194 - 194
  • [27] Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting
    Head, Stuart J.
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (06): : 577 - 578
  • [28] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses
    Kuss, Oliver
    von Salviati, Benita
    Boergermann, Jochen
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 140 (04): : 829 - U128
  • [29] Mortality of "off-pump " versus "on-pump" coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with preoperative anemia
    Deutsch, Marcus-Andre
    Zittermann, Armin
    von Dossow, Vera
    Gummert, Jan F.
    Koster, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (05): : 645 - 646
  • [30] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
    Ueki, Chikara
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    Motomura, Noboru
    Sakaguchi, Genichi
    Akimoto, Takehide
    Takamoto, Shinichi
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 151 (04): : 1092 - 1098