The Impact of Cultivation Systems on Weed Suppression and the Canopy Architecture of Spring Barley

被引:3
|
作者
Waclawowicz, Roman [1 ]
Giemza, Magdalena [2 ]
Pytlarz, Elzbieta [1 ]
Wenda-Piesik, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Inst Agroecol & Plant Prod, Pl Grunwaldzki 24a, PL-50363 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] DLF Beet Seed ApS, Hojbygardvej 31, DK-4960 Holeby, Denmark
[3] Bydgoszcz Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Agr & Biotechnol, Dept Agron, Al Kaliskiego 7, PL-85796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
spring barley; cover crop; tillage; nitrogen fertilization; weed infestation; canopy architecture; DIFFERENT TILLAGE; LONG-TERM; CROP-ROTATION; COVER CROP; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; PLANT-PROTECTION; REDUCED TILLAGE; HORDEUM-VULGARE; CATCH CROP; SOIL;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13091747
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Under the pro-environmental principles of agricultural production, soil cultivation and organic fertilization are of particular importance as strategical elements in reducing weed infestation in the context of sustainable agriculture. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of long-term practices that are used in regenerative agriculture (reducing soil tillage, cover crop management, and mineral nitrogen fertilization) on canopy weed infestation and the elements of spring barley architecture. Understanding the impact of the studied factors influences decision-making regarding weed infestation control, and thus may contribute to a reduction in herbicide use. A two-factor field experiment was conducted using the split-plot method. The main factors were four cultivation methods: 1. conventional tillage without a cover crop, 2. conventional tillage + cover crop, 3. reduced tillage + cover crop, and 4. no tillage + cover crop. The subplot factor was differentiated via nitrogen fertilization, at 40, 80, or 120 kg N & BULL;ha-1. The research covered canopy weed infestation and the parameters of spring barley canopy architecture. The species composition; the number and weight of weeds; and, for barley, the leaf area index (LAI), density, length, and tillers were determined. The test results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA) in a series of experiments while using Tukey's test for a significance level of p = 0.05. Additionally, simple linear regression analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and data clustering (CA) were utilized. The study showed that simplified tillage contributed to reducing the number of weeds in the barley tillering stage, while also contributing to an increase in weed infestation during grain harvest. Plowing in the cover crop did not reduce the presence of undesirable plants in the canopy, while increasing doses of nitrogen fertilization contributed to a reduction in the number of weeds without affecting their mass. Weed infestation was also affected by meteorological conditions. Increased rainfall in the early stages of barley development benefits the number of weeds, especially in terms of traditional cultivation. Simplified tillage resulted in a reduction in barley density, height, and LAI, as well as an increase in the branching of the tested cereal. A significant negative correlation was also found between the weed infestation of the barley canopy and the characteristics of the canopy architecture. The PCA showed that the highest tillering of barley was provided at the lowest intensity of weed infestation. In turn, the CA indicated that the significantly higher LAI that resulted from a higher density and length of barley was attributed to the simplified cultivation treatments and the practice of direct sowing. It is a comprehensive method that can favor barley growth and development conditions while weakening weed infestation potential.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INFLUENCE OF THE CULTIVATION OF THE SOIL AND FERTILIZING ON THE QUALITY OF SPRING BARLEY
    LISKA, E
    STIFFEL, R
    OBTULOVIC, P
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1987, 33 (05): : 489 - 498
  • [22] The influence of an ecological and a low input system on weed density, weed diversity and weed competition in spring barley
    Macak, M.
    Zak, S.
    Djalovic, I.
    Szombathova, N.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2008, : 425 - 430
  • [23] SPRING BARLEY WEED INFESTATION IN VARIOUS CROP ROTATION CYCLES
    Neischl, A.
    Winkler, J.
    Zelena, V.
    MENDELNET 2012, 2012, : 133 - 141
  • [24] Effect of reduced herbicide dosages on weed infestation in spring barley
    Talgre, Liina
    Lauringson, Enn
    Koppel, Mati
    ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2008, 95 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [25] A weed suppressive index for spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties
    Hansen, P. K.
    Kristensen, K.
    Willas, J.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (03) : 225 - 236
  • [26] Weed Management in Spring Seeded Barley, Oats, and Wheat with Prosulfuron
    Soltani, Nader
    Brown, Lynette R.
    Cowan, Todd
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2014, 2014
  • [27] Weed:spring barley competition for applied nitrogen in pig slurry
    Petersen, J
    WEED RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [28] THE CROP ROTATION INFLUENCE OF THE WEED INFESTATION AT THE SPRING BARLEY CROP
    Neischl, A.
    Zelena, V
    Winkler, J.
    MENDELNET 2010, 2010, : 104 - 110
  • [29] Effects of fertilizer placement on weeds in weed harrowed spring barley
    Rasmussen, K
    Rasmussen, J
    Petersen, J
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 46 (03): : 192 - 196
  • [30] RESPONSE OF SPRING BARLEY AND WEED COMMUNITIES TO LIME, PHOSPHORUS AND TILLAGE
    LEGERE, A
    SIMARD, RR
    LAPIERRE, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1994, 74 (03) : 421 - 428