A Comparative Analysis of High Availability for Linux Container Infrastructures

被引:2
|
作者
Simon, Marek [1 ]
Huraj, Ladislav [1 ]
Bucik, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ SS Cyril & Methodius, Inst Comp Technol & Informat, Trnava 91701, Slovakia
来源
FUTURE INTERNET | 2023年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
high availability; containers; Linux; Kubernetes; Proxmox; Docker; Docker Swarm; DOCKER;
D O I
10.3390/fi15080253
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the current era of prevailing information technology, the requirement for high availability and reliability of various types of services is critical. This paper focusses on the comparison and analysis of different high-availability solutions for Linux container environments. The objective was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each solution and to determine the optimal container approach for common use cases. Through a series of structured experiments, basic performance metrics were collected, including average service recovery time, average transfer rate, and total number of failed calls. The container platforms tested included Docker, Kubernetes, and Proxmox. On the basis of a comprehensive evaluation, it can be concluded that Docker with Docker Swarm is generally the most effective high-availability solution for commonly used Linux containers. Nevertheless, there are specific scenarios in which Proxmox stands out, for example, when fast data transfer is a priority or when load balancing is not a critical requirement.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LXCloudFT: Towards high availability, fault tolerant Cloud system based Linux Containers
    Louati, Thouraya
    Abbes, Heithem
    Cerin, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2018, 122 : 51 - 69
  • [42] Wind River Linux Now Features Container Tech
    Waurzyniak, Patrick
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2019, 163 (03): : 32 - 32
  • [43] Docker Container Deployment in Distributed Fog Infrastructures with Checkpoint/Restart
    Ahmed, Arif
    Mohan, Apoorve
    Cooperman, Gene
    Pierre, Guillaume
    2020 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE CLOUD COMPUTING, SERVICES, AND ENGINEERING (MOBILE CLOUD 2020), 2020, : 55 - 62
  • [44] Comparative Analysis of Trace Tools for Real-Time Linux
    de Oliveira, D. B.
    de Oliveira, R. S.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2014, 12 (06) : 1134 - 1140
  • [45] Comparative Analysis of Trace Tools for Real-Time Linux
    1600, IEEE Computer Society (12):
  • [46] INFRASTRUCTURES FOR COMPARATIVE POLITICAL RESEARCH
    KAASE, M
    CROSSROADS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE : THE ICPSR 25TH ANNIVERSARY VOLUME, 1989, : 166 - 174
  • [47] A Comparative Analysis: Various Storage Rules in Container Yards and Their Performances
    Ma, Yaowen
    Kim, Kap Hwan
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 11 (03): : 276 - 287
  • [48] Output-feedback control of container cranes: a comparative analysis
    Bartolini, G
    Pisano, A
    Usai, E
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, 2002, : 3237 - 3242
  • [49] Output-feedback control of container cranes: A comparative analysis
    Bartolini, G
    Pisano, A
    Usai, E
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2003, 5 (04) : 578 - 593
  • [50] A Comparative Analysis of Metaheuristic Techniques for High Availability Systems (vol 12, pg 7382, 2024)
    Syed, Darakhshan
    Shaikh, Ghulam Muhammad
    Alshahrani, Hani Mohammed
    Hamdi, Mohammed
    Alsulami, Mohammad
    Shaikh, Asadullah
    Rizwan, Syed
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 162237 - 162237