Decision-making for the hazard ranking of water distribution networks using the TOPSIS method

被引:1
|
作者
Park, HaeKeum [1 ]
Kim, KiBum [2 ]
Hyung, JinSeok [1 ]
Kim, TaeHyeon [1 ]
Koo, Jayong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN USA
关键词
entropy weight; GIS; hazard ranking; TOPSIS method; water distribution networks;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2023.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Owing to the consecutive occurrence of water quality incidents, such as the black and red water situation in Incheon, Mullae (Seoul), and Pohang, as well as the tap water larval events in Incheon and Jeju in 2020, the Ministry of Environment, announced the new addition of Article12-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply And Waterworks Installation Act 2021. Additionally, the importance of intensive management for vulnerable areas where water quality incidents and complaints may occur repeatedly was specified. Therefore, this study suggests the hazard ranking of district-metered areas in the study area using the deterioration of the water distribution network, complaints (water quality, leakage), and modeling results (water pressure, residual chlorine concentration) to support the establishment of a reasonable water distribution network maintenance plan. The effective and sustainable maintenance of the water distribution network is possible if the hazard ranking is regularly determined using the suggested methodology proposed herein and the water distribution network intensive management area is managed.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 726
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interval number multi-attribute decision-making method based on TOPSIS
    Jiang, Jirong
    Ren, Min
    Wang, Jiqiang
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (07) : 5059 - 5064
  • [42] The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model
    Noori A.
    Bonakdari H.
    Morovati K.
    Gharabaghi B.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2018, 38 (4) : 471 - 488
  • [43] A fuzzy multi-objective group decision-making method based on TOPSIS
    Meng, B
    Gu, JM
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2002, : 262 - 265
  • [44] The relative decision-making algorithm for ranking data
    Chen, Yin-Ju
    Lo, Jian-Ming
    DATA TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 55 (02) : 177 - 191
  • [45] DECISION-MAKING, NEW INFORMATION, RANKING AND STRUCTURE
    SAATY, TL
    MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 8 : 125 - 132
  • [46] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING USING PARETO OPTIMALITY AND PROMETHEE PREFERENCE RANKING
    LEWI, PJ
    VANHOOF, J
    BOEY, P
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1992, 16 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [47] A NEW RANKING METHOD OF ALTERNATIVES FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING IN SOCIAL NETWORKS
    Chukhno, Nadezhda
    Chukhno, Olga
    Gaidamaka, Anna
    Samouylov, Konstantin
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ULTRA MODERN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND WORKSHOPS (ICUMT 2018): EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONNECTED SOCIETY, 2018,
  • [48] Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods for implementation in water resources decision-making
    Prodanovic, P
    Simonovic, SP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 29 (05) : 692 - 701
  • [49] Water-Quality-Based Ranking and Benchmarking of Rivers in India Using a Multicriteria Decision-Making Technique
    Sippi, Sudha
    Parmar, Dipteek
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2022, 26 (02)
  • [50] Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making TOPSIS for Distribution Center Location Selection
    Hu, Yaodong
    Wu, Shuyan
    Cai, Liya
    NSWCTC 2009: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS SECURITY, WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND TRUSTED COMPUTING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 707 - +