Lessons on harmonization of scoring criteria for dicentric chromosome assay in South Korea

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Yang Hee [1 ]
Yoon, Hyo Jin [1 ]
Yang, Su San [1 ]
Lee, In Kyung [2 ]
Jo, Wol Soon [3 ]
Jeong, Soo Kyung [3 ]
Oh, Su Jung [3 ]
Kim, Jiin
Lee, Younghyun [4 ,5 ]
Seong, Ki Moon [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Radiol Med Sci KIRA MS, Natl Radiat Emergency Med Ctr NREMC, Lab Biol Dosimetry, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Hydro & Nucl Power Co, Radiat Hlth Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Dong Nam Inst Radiol & Med Sci DIRAMS, Res Ctr, Busan, South Korea
[4] Soonchunhyang Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med Sci, Asan, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med Sci, Dept Biomed Lab Sci, Asan, South Korea
关键词
Biodosimetry; dicentric chromosome assay; harmonization; scoring; radiological accidents; BIOLOGICAL DOSIMETRY; NETWORK; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1080/09553002.2024.2316603
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
PurposeNetworking with other biodosimetry laboratories is necessary to assess the radiation exposure of many individuals in large-scale radiological accidents. The Korea biodosimetry network, K-BioDos, prepared harmonized scoring guidelines for dicentric chromosome assay to obtain homogeneous results within the network and investigated the efficiency of the guidelines.Materials and methodsThree laboratories in K-BioDos harmonized the scoring guidelines for dicentric chromosome assay. The results of scoring dicentric chromosomes using the harmonized scoring guidelines were compared with the laboratories' results using their own methods. Feedback was collected from the scorers following the three intercomparison exercises in 3 consecutive years.ResultsK-BioDos members showed comparable capacity to score dicentrics in the three exercises. However, the results of the K-BioDos guidelines showed no significant improvement over those of the scorers' own methods. According to the scorers, our harmonized guidelines led to more rejected metaphases and ultimately decreased the number of scorable metaphases compared with their own methods. Moreover, the scoring time was sometimes longer with the K-BioDos protocol because some scorers were not yet familiar with the guidelines, though most scorers reported that the time decreased or was unchanged. These challenges may cause low adherence to the guidelines. Most scorers expressed willingness to use the guidelines to select scorable metaphases or identify dicentrics for other biodosimetry works, whereas one did not want to use it due to the difference from their calibration curves.ConclusionsWe identified potential resistance to following the harmonized guidelines and received requests for more detailed methods. Our findings suggest that the harmonized criteria should be continually updated, and education and training should be provided for all scorers. These changes could allow members within the biodosimetry network to successfully collaborate and support each other in large-scale radiological accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 714
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital Textbook Program in Malaysia: Lessons from South Korea
    Hamedi M.A.
    Ezaleila S.M.
    [J]. Publishing Research Quarterly, 2015, 31 (4) : 244 - 257
  • [42] Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay: Potential Implications for Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome in Radiological Mass Casualties
    Romm, Horst
    Wilkins, Ruth C.
    Coleman, C. Norman
    Lillis-Hearne, Patricia K.
    Pellmar, Terry C.
    Livingston, Gordon K.
    Awa, Akio A.
    Jenkins, Mark S.
    Yoshida, Mitsuaki A.
    Oestreicher, Ursula
    Prasanna, Pataje G. S.
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 2011, 175 (03) : 397 - 404
  • [43] RENEB/EURADOS field exercise 2019: robust dose estimation under outdoor conditions based on the dicentric chromosome assay
    Endesfelder, David
    Oestreicher, Ursula
    Kulka, Ulrike
    Ainsbury, Elizabeth A.
    Moquet, Jayne
    Barnard, Stephen
    Gregoire, Eric
    Martinez, Juan S.
    Trompier, Francois
    Ristic, Yoann
    Woda, Clemens
    Waldner, Lovisa
    Beinke, Christina
    Vral, Anne
    Barquinero, Joan-Francesc
    Hernandez, Alfredo
    Sommer, Sylwester
    Lumniczky, Katalin
    Hargitai, Rita
    Montoro, Alegria
    Milic, Mirta
    Monteiro Gil, Octavia
    Valente, Marco
    Bobyk, Laure
    Sevriukova, Olga
    Sabatier, Laure
    Prieto, Maria Jesus
    Moreno Domene, Mercedes
    Testa, Antonella
    Patrono, Clarice
    Terzoudi, Georgia
    Triantopoulou, Sotiria
    Histova, Rositsa
    Wojcik, Andrzej
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 97 (09) : 1181 - 1198
  • [44] Lessons to learn from MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea
    Khan, Adnan
    Farooqui, Amber
    Guan, Yi
    Kelvin, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2015, 9 (06): : 543 - 546
  • [45] Financial crisis and elusive recovery - Lessons from South Korea and Thailand
    Chandrasekhar, CP
    Ghosh, J
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1999, 34 (05) : 273 - 286
  • [46] Trends and issues in action learning practice: lessons from South Korea
    MacKenzie, Bob
    [J]. ACTION LEARNING, 2014, 11 (03): : 380 - 385
  • [47] Deja Vu in South Korea? Lessons from the 1992 Philippines Withdrawal
    Lee, Jung-Hoon
    Phillips, Joe
    [J]. WASHINGTON QUARTERLY, 2019, 42 (04): : 107 - 130
  • [48] Improving performance management in local government: Lessons from South Korea
    Seo, Young-Bin
    Lee, Yoon-Shik
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [49] SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE IN MALAYSIA - LESSONS FROM THAILAND AND SOUTH KOREA
    Lee, Nathaniel
    [J]. KAJIAN MALAYSIA, 2012, 30 (01): : 51 - 70
  • [50] Strategic Government Spending in South Korea and Taiwan: Lessons for Emergent Democracies
    Yap, O. Fiona
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 91 (03) : 613 - 634