Evaluation of treatment response by Hopkins criteria on18F FDG PET-CT in patients of non-small cell lung cancer and its comparison with PERCIST response criteria

Aim To assess treatment response on FDG PET-CT in NSCLC patients by visual Hopkins score compared to PERCIST criteria and its potential for prognostication (or its correlation with survival).Methods Forty-four NSCLC patients with baseline and post-treatment FDG PET-CT scans were included, and interpreted using Hopkins and PERCIST criteria classifying patients into responders and non-responders. PERCIST-based CMR and PMR, and Hopkins Scores 1,2,3 were classified responders. PERCIST-based SD and PD and Hopkins scores 4,5 were classified as non-responders. Patients were followed upto 24 months after treatment completion. Cohen kappa for inter-criteria agreement and Kaplan Meir curve for overall survival (OS) analysis done.Results Out of 44 patients, PERCIST classified 27 (61.3%) as responders and 17 (38.6%) as non-responders, whereas Hopkins classified 12 patients (27.3%) as responders and 32 (72.7%) as non-responders. Inter-criteria agreement was low (kappa=0.19) with discordance in 45.5% of patients. Eighteen of 20 discordant cases were non-responders on Hopkins and responders on PERCIST, of which 88.8% were non-responders on follow-up as predicted by Hopkins. PERCIST responders had OS of 96.4% and 64.3% at 9 and 24 months, respectively, while non-responders OS was 93.5% and 40.2% at 9 and 24 months, respectively (P-value = 0.049). However, responders on Hopkins had OS of 100% at 24 months, whereas non-responders had OS of 93.5% and 51.5% at 9 and 24 months, respectively (P-value = 0.232).Conclusion Semi-quantitative PERCIST and visual Hopkins criteria show low inter-criteria agreement, with visual criteria better-predicting survival in patients of NSCLC.