Pancreatic imaging in MEN1-comparison of conventional and somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in real-life setting

被引:5
|
作者
Kostiainen, Iiro [1 ,2 ]
Majala, Susanna [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Schildt, Jukka [2 ,6 ]
Parviainen, Helka [7 ,8 ]
Kauhanen, Saila [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Seppanen, Hanna [2 ,9 ]
Miettinen, Paivi J. [2 ,10 ]
Matikainen, Niina [1 ,2 ]
Ryhanen, Eeva M. [1 ,2 ]
Schalin-Jantti, Camilla [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Abdominal Ctr, Endocrinol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[3] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Digest Surg & Urol, Turku 20251, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Turku 20251, Finland
[5] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku PET Ctr, Turku 20521, Finland
[6] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS Med Imaging Ctr, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[7] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS Med Imaging Ctr, Dept Radiol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[8] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Wellbeing Serv Cty Ostrobothn, Vaasa 65130, Finland
[9] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Fac Med, iCAN Digital Precis Canc Med Flagship, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg,Translat Canc Med Prog, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[10] Helsinki Univ Hosp, New Childrens Hosp, Pediat Res Ctr, Helsinki 00029, Finland
关键词
MEN1; pancreas; NET; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; somatostatin receptor PET; CT; ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-1; ENETS CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS; PET/CT; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/ejendo/lvad035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) are the leading cause of death in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). The role of somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR PET/CT) in MEN1 has not been established. The aim was to assess pancreatic imaging in MEN1 in a real-life setting. Design Fifty-eight patients with MEN1 [median age 40 (range 16-72) years] underwent SSTR PET/CT imaging; either as a screening tool regardless of disease stage (n = 47) or to further characterize known panNETs (n = 11). SSTR PET/CT and matched conventional imaging were blindly analyzed. We assessed the findings and the impact of SSTR PET/CT during a median follow-up of 47 months. Results SSTR PET/CT detected three times as many panNETs as conventional imaging (P < .001). SSTR PET/CT altered the management of 27 patients (47%). Seven patients (12%) were referred for surgery, and five (9%) received systemic treatment. In 15/25 (60%) patients with no previous panNET (n = 22) or in remission after surgery (n = 3), SSTR PET/CT identified a panNET (n = 14) or recurrence (n = 1). In eight patients, SSTR PET/CT revealed a panNET not immediately visible on conventional imaging. During a median follow-up of 47 months, three became visible on conventional imaging, but none required intervention. When SSTR PET/CT was negative, no panNETs were identified on conventional imaging during 38 months of follow-up. Conclusions SSTR PET/CT demonstrates high accuracy in the detection of panNETs and alters the clinical management in nearly half of the MEN1-patients. SSTR PET/CT enables timely diagnosis and staging of MEN1-related panNETs.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nagarajah, James
    Buchbender, Christian
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Poeppel, Thorsten
    Forsting, Michael
    Quick, Harald H.
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 505 - 513
  • [32] Imaging in prostate cancer with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and gallium positron emission tomography-computed tomography: 'the real deal'?
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 1 - 2
  • [33] Nanoparticle positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of chemokine receptor CCR5 in atherosclerosis
    Luehmann, Hannah
    Pressly, Eric
    Detering, Lisa
    Pierce, Richard
    Hawker, Craig
    Woodard, Pamela
    Randolph, Gwendalyn
    Gropler, Robert
    Liu, Yongjian
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [34] Imaging of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients in the era of somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography-computed tomography: "no place to hide for neuroendocrine tumours"
    Cuny, Thomas
    Fargette, Christelle
    Taieb, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 188 (05) : C9 - C10
  • [35] New Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for Bone Metastases
    Doyle-Lindrud, Susan
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (02) : 135 - 136
  • [36] Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of head and neck tumors: An atlas
    Graham, MM
    Menda, Y
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (04) : 220 - 252
  • [37] DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS WITH POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/ COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING
    Stoltzfus, Trevor
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 3620 - 3620
  • [38] Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Correlate of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
    Sarkar, Souvik
    Matsukuma, Karen E.
    Spencer, Benjamin
    Chen, Shuai
    Olson, Kristin A.
    Badawi, Ramsey D.
    Corwin, Michael T.
    Wang, Guobao
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (11) : 2441 - 2443
  • [39] Gossypiboma of Axilla: Imaging Pitfalls on Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
    Kuruva, Manohar
    Jambhekar, Kedar
    Viswamitra, Sanjaya
    Ram, Roopa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (02): : 143 - 144
  • [40] Positron emission tomography/computed tomography-imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls
    Bockisch, A
    Beyer, T
    Antoch, G
    Freudenberg, LS
    Kühl, H
    Debatin, JF
    Müller, SP
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (04) : 188 - 199