Understanding Patient Perspectives Toward Shared Decision-Making in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension

被引:0
|
作者
Tobita, Kazuki [1 ,2 ]
Sakamoto, Hayato [3 ]
Inami, Takumi [2 ]
Fujisawa, Daisuke [4 ]
Takeuchi, Kaori [2 ]
Kikuchi, Hanako [2 ]
Ito, Junnosuke [2 ]
Goda, Ayumi [2 ]
Soejima, Kyoko [2 ]
Kohno, Takashi [2 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Med Univ, Fac Hlth & Med Care, Dept Phys Therapy, Saitama, Japan
[2] Kyorin Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyorin Univ, Dept Rehabil, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo, Japan
来源
关键词
patient perspective; pulmonary hypertension; shared decision-making; treatment goal; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Clinical guidelines for pulmonary hypertension (PH) recommend shared decision-making and individualized treatment. However, patient perspectives on PH treatment goals, preference toward a decision-making style of treatment, and adoption of shared decision -making remain unclear. This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study assessed the patients' preferred and actual participation role in treatment decision-making, rated on 5 scales (ranging from passive [patients leave all decisions to physicians] to active [patients make the decision after physicians show patients several options]) and evaluated the concordance between preferred and actual participation roles. The important factors underlying patients' perspectives in treatment decision-making (i.e., prognosis; symptom, financial, family, and social burdens; patient values; and physician recommendation) were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the patients with a positive preference toward "physician recommendation" in treatment decision-making. Among 130 patients with PH (median age: 58 years; mean pulmonary arterial pressure: 23 mm Hg; 27.7% were males), 59.2% preferred that "physicians make the decision regarding treatment after showing patients therapeutic options (i.e., intermediate between passive and active roles)." The patient-preferred and actual participation roles in decision-making had moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.46). The most important factor in treatment decisions was "symptom burden reduction" (93.8%). Although 85.0% of patients chose "physician recommendation" as an important factor, 49.6% chose "alignment with my values." The determinants of patients who chose "physician recommendation" were less severe hemodynamics and better functional capacity. In conclusion, patients with PH preferred that the "physicians make the decision after showing patients therapeutic options" and prioritized physician recommendation over their values.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared decision-making not for all patients
    不详
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 54 (12): : 1028 - 1028
  • [32] The Role of Patients Shared Decision-Making
    Beers, Emily
    Nilsen, Marci Lee
    Johnson, Jonas T.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 50 (04) : 689 - +
  • [33] Shared Decision-Making in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Understanding Surgeon and Patient Perspectives Regarding When It Is Time for Surgery
    Kroll, Elizabeth A.
    Warren, Celestine E.
    Schlegel, Robert
    Evarts, C. McCollister
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Persels, Conrad
    Mullen, Nancy A.
    Crummer, Mary Beth
    Seeley, Sally P.
    Lockett, Sue
    Moschetti, Wayne E.
    Nace, James
    Cohen, Eric M.
    Lanting, Brent
    Iorio, Richard
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Browne, James A.
    Lindsey, Brock A.
    Kain, Michael S.
    Fillingham, Yale A.
    Terek, Richard M.
    Garvin, Kevin L.
    Huddleston III, James I.
    Chomos, Stephanie F.
    Lewis, Kimberly M.
    Lambourne, Carol A.
    Pellegrini Jr, Vincent D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2025, 107 (06): : 575 - 585
  • [34] Shared decision-making in hypertension: results of implementation in Germany
    Deinzer, A.
    Babel, H.
    Veelken, R.
    Kohnen, R.
    Schmieder, R. E.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2006, 131 (46) : 2592 - 2596
  • [35] BARRIERS TO PATIENT EMPOWERMENT AND SHARED DECISION-MAKING (SDM): HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) PERSPECTIVES
    Kundrod, Sarita
    Plaksin, Joseph
    Wallach, Andrew B.
    Zabar, Sondra
    Altshuler, Lisa
    Kalet, Adina
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S109 - S110
  • [36] Using patient and physician perspectives to develop a shared decision-making framework for colorectal cancer
    Leon-Carlyle, Marisa
    Spiegle, Gillian
    Schmocker, Selina
    Gagliardi, Anna
    Urbach, David
    Kennedy, Erin
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [37] Using patient and physician perspectives to develop a shared decision-making framework for colorectal cancer
    Marisa Leon-Carlyle
    Gillian Spiegle
    Selina Schmocker
    Anna Gagliardi
    David Urbach
    Erin Kennedy
    Implementation Science, 4
  • [38] Race and shared decision-making: Perspectives of African-American patients with diabetes
    Peek, M. E.
    Odoms-Young, A.
    Quinn, M. T.
    Gorawara-Bhat, R.
    Wilson, S. C.
    Chin, M. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 167 (11) : S7 - S7
  • [39] The shared decision-making model: Providers' and patients' knowledge and understanding in clinical practice
    Baca-Dietz, Debbie
    Wojnar, Danuta M.
    Espina, Christine R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2021, 33 (07) : 529 - 536
  • [40] New resources for understanding patients' values in the context of shared clinical decision-making
    Fulford, Kenneth W. M.
    Handa, Ashok
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 20 (03) : 446 - 447