Use of cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Iyer, Neel S. [1 ]
Khanuja, Kavisha [1 ]
Roman, Amanda [1 ]
Al-Kouatly, Huda B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19144 USA
关键词
autologous transfusion; cell salvage; cesarean delivery; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; BLOOD SALVAGE; RISK-FACTORS; EFFICACY; SURGERY; SECTION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101257
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Excess blood loss from obstetrical hemorrhage requires transfusion of donor blood, a finite resource. Intraoperative cell salvage collects a patient's own blood that has been lost during cesarean delivery and returns it to their own circulation. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the perioperative outcomes in patients receiving cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from database inception through October 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the use of cell salvage to standard-of-care during cesarean delivery. METHODS: Two authors independently extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcomes were the rate of donor blood transfusion and change in hemoglobin level. The secondary outcomes included transfusion reaction, amniotic fluid embolism, and length of hospital stay. Results were summarized as weighted mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was measured using Higgins I2. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n=3361) comparing cell salvage to standard care during cesarean delivery met the inclusion criteria. Primary analysis showed a significant decrease in receiving allogeneic blood transfusion with intraoperative cell salvage use vs standard care (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.46), with no change in hemoglobin drop (mean difference, -0.77; 95% confidence interval, -1.67 to -0.14). The secondary outcomes showed no difference in transfusion reaction (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confi- dence interval, 0.06-5.59), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -1.90; 95% confidence interval, -4.85 to 1.06). No cases of amniotic fluid embolism were reported among the 1685 patients who received cell salvage. CONCLUSION: Use of cell salvage during cesarean delivery reduced the overall need for allogeneic blood transfusion without increasing the risk of complications, including no cases of amniotic fluid embolism.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Felder, Laura
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Scuotto, Sergio
    Monks, David T.
    Carvalho, Jose C. A.
    Zullo, Fulvio
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 233 : 98 - 106
  • [32] Magnesium sulfate reduces postoperative pain in women with cesarean section: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ma, Siguang
    Zhang, Yanju
    Li, Qian
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (01) : 8 - 18
  • [33] Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Controlled Treatment Trials for Achalasia
    Lan Wang
    You-Ming Li
    Lan Li
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2009, 54 (12) : 2769 - 2770
  • [34] Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Controlled Treatment Trials for Achalasia
    Wang, Lan
    Li, You-Ming
    Li, Lan
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2009, 54 (11) : 2303 - 2311
  • [35] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of rescue angioplasty
    Bainbridge, T
    Fath-Ordoubadi, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 96 (7A): : 64H - 65H
  • [36] Hydroxychloroquine safety: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Eljaaly, Khalid
    Alireza, Kasim Huseein
    Alshehri, Samah
    Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 36
  • [37] Ultrathin Colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sawas, Tarek
    Cho, Won
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S683 - S683
  • [38] Assisted hatching - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sallam, HN
    Sadek, SS
    Agameya, AF
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 20 (08) : 332 - 342
  • [39] Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Controlled Treatment Trials for Achalasia
    Lan Wang
    You-Ming Li
    Lan Li
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2009, 54 : 2303 - 2311
  • [40] Differential attrition in randomized controlled trials: A meta-analysis
    Crutzen, Rik
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Kotz, Daniel
    Spigt, Mark
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2013, 28 : 194 - 195