Use of cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Iyer, Neel S. [1 ]
Khanuja, Kavisha [1 ]
Roman, Amanda [1 ]
Al-Kouatly, Huda B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19144 USA
关键词
autologous transfusion; cell salvage; cesarean delivery; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; BLOOD SALVAGE; RISK-FACTORS; EFFICACY; SURGERY; SECTION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101257
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Excess blood loss from obstetrical hemorrhage requires transfusion of donor blood, a finite resource. Intraoperative cell salvage collects a patient's own blood that has been lost during cesarean delivery and returns it to their own circulation. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the perioperative outcomes in patients receiving cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from database inception through October 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the use of cell salvage to standard-of-care during cesarean delivery. METHODS: Two authors independently extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcomes were the rate of donor blood transfusion and change in hemoglobin level. The secondary outcomes included transfusion reaction, amniotic fluid embolism, and length of hospital stay. Results were summarized as weighted mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was measured using Higgins I2. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n=3361) comparing cell salvage to standard care during cesarean delivery met the inclusion criteria. Primary analysis showed a significant decrease in receiving allogeneic blood transfusion with intraoperative cell salvage use vs standard care (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.46), with no change in hemoglobin drop (mean difference, -0.77; 95% confidence interval, -1.67 to -0.14). The secondary outcomes showed no difference in transfusion reaction (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confi- dence interval, 0.06-5.59), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -1.90; 95% confidence interval, -4.85 to 1.06). No cases of amniotic fluid embolism were reported among the 1685 patients who received cell salvage. CONCLUSION: Use of cell salvage during cesarean delivery reduced the overall need for allogeneic blood transfusion without increasing the risk of complications, including no cases of amniotic fluid embolism.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Timing of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Weed, Samantha
    Baxter, Jason K.
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 115S - 115S
  • [2] Cell Salvage in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
    Voorn, Veronique M.
    So-Osman, Cynthia
    Vlieland, Thea P. Vliet
    Dahan, Albert
    Gemert, Ankie W. Koopman-van
    Vehmeijer, Stephan B.
    Nelissen, Rob G.
    Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (12): : 1012 - 1021
  • [3] Propranolol to decrease time to delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Biswas, Sonia
    Toro, Mariella
    Horgan, Rebecca
    McLaren Jr, Rodney A.
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Al-Kouatly, Huda B.
    Sources, Data
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (10)
  • [4] Use of cell salvage at time of cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khanuja, Kavisha
    Iyer, Neel
    Roman, Amanda
    Al-Kouatly, Huda B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S509 - S510
  • [5] The efficacy of abdominal binder in women undergoing cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Shu-Ling
    Yen, Chih-Feng
    Hsieh, Chia-Jung
    Chang, Wen-Pei
    Wang, Chia-Hui
    MIDWIFERY, 2025, 142
  • [6] Planned cesarean delivery vs planned vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Adewale, Victoria
    Varotsis, Dante
    Iyer, Neel
    Di Mascio, Daniele
    Dupont, Axelle
    Abramowitz, Laurent
    Steer, Philip J.
    Gimovsky, Martin
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (12)
  • [7] Manual Removal versus Spontaneous Delivery of the Placenta at Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Meng-Chang
    Li, Peng
    Su, Wen-Jie
    Jiang, Rong
    Deng, Jia
    Wang, Ru-Rong
    Huang, Chao-Li
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 1283 - 1293
  • [8] Early hospital discharge after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chaarani, Nadim
    Sorrenti, Sara
    Sasanelli, Antonio
    Di Mascio, Daniele
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (12)
  • [9] Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Uppal, Vishal
    Retter, Susanne
    Casey, Margaret
    Sancheti, Sushil
    Matheson, Kara
    McKeen, Dolores M.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (01): : 111 - 125
  • [10] Timing of Intravenous Prophylactic Antibiotic Agents for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zeng, Shuai
    Liu, Yijun
    Chen, Meng
    Ruan, Tiechao
    Lu, Wenting
    Liu, Xinghui
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2023, 24 (04) : 303 - 310