Triggering of ovulation for GnRH-antagonist cycles in normal and low ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:2
|
作者
He, Fang-Fang [1 ]
Hu, Wenhui [1 ]
Yong, Lin [1 ]
Li, Yu-Mei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Jinjiang Dist Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Reprod Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Assisted Reprod, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
GnRH agonist; hCG; Randomized trial; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; FINAL OOCYTE MATURATION; AGONIST PLUS HCG; HORMONE AGONIST; DUAL TRIGGER; FOLLICULAR MATURATION; LUTEAL-PHASE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] of final oocyte maturation can improve the number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate in low or normal responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.Study design: Studies up to October 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR), and continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature [metaphase II (MII)] oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate; other IVF outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.Results: Seven studies were identified, and 898 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved [WMD = 1.38 (95% CI 0.47-2.28), I2 = 66%, p = 0.003, low evidence], number of MII oocytes [WMD = 0.7 (95% CI 0.35-1.05), I2 = 42%, p < 0.0001, moderate evidence], number of embryos [WMD = 0.68 (95% CI 0.07-1.3), I2 = 67%, p = 0.03, low evidence] and number of good quality embryos [WMD = 1.14 (95% CI 0.35-1.93), I2 = 0%, p = 0.005, moderate evidence] in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than in the hCG trigger group. The results of the ovarian response subgroup analysis showed significant differences in all of these outcomes in normal responders, and no differences in any of the outcomes in low responders, except for the number of MII oocytes. In low responders, clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in the dual trigger group [RR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.05-4.61), I2 = 28%, p = 0.04, low evidence].Conclusion: Dual triggering by GnRH agonist and hCG improved oocyte maturity and embryo grading for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering for final oocyte maturation may improve clinical pregnancy rates in low responders.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment in women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Meixiang
    Niu, Wenbin
    Wang, Yu
    Xu, Jiawei
    Bao, Xiao
    Wang, Linlin
    Du, Linqing
    Sun, Yingpu
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (08) : 981 - 991
  • [22] Is there a place for corifollitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Youssef, Mohamed Abdelfattah Mahmoud
    van Wely, Madelon
    Aboulfoutouh, Ismail
    El-Khyat, Walid
    van der Veen, Fulco
    Al-Inany, Hesham
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 97 (04) : 876 - 885
  • [23] Development and validation of a prediction model for suboptimal ovarian response in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles
    Xu, Xiaohang
    Jiang, Yilin
    Du, Jinlin
    Sun, Haoyue
    Wang, Xue
    Zhang, Cuilian
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [24] MILD ovarian stimulation with GnRH-antagonist vs. long protocol with low dose FSH for non-PCO high responders undergoing IVF: a prospective, randomized study including thawing cycles
    Simona Casano
    Daniela Guidetti
    Ambra Patriarca
    Giulia Pittatore
    Gianluca Gennarelli
    Alberto Revelli
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2012, 29 : 1343 - 1351
  • [25] MILD ovarian stimulation with GnRH-antagonist vs. long protocol with low dose FSH for non-PCO high responders undergoing IVF: a prospective, randomized study including thawing cycles
    Casano, Simona
    Guidetti, Daniela
    Patriarca, Ambra
    Pittatore, Giulia
    Gennarelli, Gianluca
    Revelli, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (12) : 1343 - 1351
  • [26] Ovulation triggering with hCG alone, GnRH agonist alone or in combination? A randomized controlled trial in advanced-age women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles
    Zhou, Chengliang
    Yang, Xinyue
    Wang, Yong
    Xi, Ji
    Pan, Hong
    Wang, Min
    Zhou, Yuzhong
    Xiao, Yu
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (08) : 1795 - 1805
  • [27] Androgen treatment in women undergoing IVF/ICSI with poor ovarian reserve (POR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bradley, N.
    Vorster, D.
    Robinson, L.
    Ghosh, J.
    Jeve, Y.
    Chu, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 1440 - 1440
  • [28] Indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gayete-Lafuente, Sonia
    Famada, Anna Vila
    Albayrak, Nazli
    Gomez, Juan Jose Espinos
    Vizcaino, Miguel Angel Checa
    Moreno-Sepulveda, Jos
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (03)
  • [29] Could mild/minimal ovarian stimulation-IVF displace conventional IVF in poor responder women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment cycles: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Youssef, M.
    Aboulfoutouh, I.
    Al-Inany, H.
    van der Veen, F.
    van Wely, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [30] Adjuvant treatment strategies in ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Chao
    Shu, Jing
    Guo, Jing
    Chang, Hsun-Ming
    Leung, Peter C. K.
    Sheng, Jian-Zhong
    Huang, Hefeng
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2020, 26 (02) : 247 - 263