Triggering of ovulation for GnRH-antagonist cycles in normal and low ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:2
|
作者
He, Fang-Fang [1 ]
Hu, Wenhui [1 ]
Yong, Lin [1 ]
Li, Yu-Mei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Jinjiang Dist Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Reprod Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Assisted Reprod, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
GnRH agonist; hCG; Randomized trial; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; FINAL OOCYTE MATURATION; AGONIST PLUS HCG; HORMONE AGONIST; DUAL TRIGGER; FOLLICULAR MATURATION; LUTEAL-PHASE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] of final oocyte maturation can improve the number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate in low or normal responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.Study design: Studies up to October 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR), and continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature [metaphase II (MII)] oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate; other IVF outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.Results: Seven studies were identified, and 898 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved [WMD = 1.38 (95% CI 0.47-2.28), I2 = 66%, p = 0.003, low evidence], number of MII oocytes [WMD = 0.7 (95% CI 0.35-1.05), I2 = 42%, p < 0.0001, moderate evidence], number of embryos [WMD = 0.68 (95% CI 0.07-1.3), I2 = 67%, p = 0.03, low evidence] and number of good quality embryos [WMD = 1.14 (95% CI 0.35-1.93), I2 = 0%, p = 0.005, moderate evidence] in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than in the hCG trigger group. The results of the ovarian response subgroup analysis showed significant differences in all of these outcomes in normal responders, and no differences in any of the outcomes in low responders, except for the number of MII oocytes. In low responders, clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in the dual trigger group [RR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.05-4.61), I2 = 28%, p = 0.04, low evidence].Conclusion: Dual triggering by GnRH agonist and hCG improved oocyte maturity and embryo grading for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering for final oocyte maturation may improve clinical pregnancy rates in low responders.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparisons of GnRH Antagonist versus GnRH Agonist Protocol in Supposed Normal Ovarian Responders Undergoing IVF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiao, Jin-song
    Su, Cun-mei
    Zeng, Xian-tao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [2] Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Chi-Huang
    Tzeng, Chii-Ruey
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    Liu, Wei-Min
    Chang, Heng-Yu
    Chen, Huang-Hui
    Chen, Ching-Hui
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [3] Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chi-Huang Chen
    Chii-Ruey Tzeng
    Peng-Hui Wang
    Wei-Min Liu
    Heng-Yu Chang
    Huang-Hui Chen
    Ching-Hui Chen
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 17 - 26
  • [4] Recombinant-luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GNRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hua, Lan
    Wang, Cong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 283 : 43 - 48
  • [5] The effect of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Peiwen
    Wu, Ruxing
    Zhang, Hanwang
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [6] The effect of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Peiwen Yang
    Ruxing Wu
    Hanwang Zhang
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 18
  • [7] Meta-analysis of trigger timing in normal responders undergoing GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol
    Xie, Qijun
    Ni, Danyu
    Chen, Sisi
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Wang, Jue
    Ling, Xiufeng
    Shen, Rong
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [8] Meta-analysis of trigger timing in normal responders undergoing GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol
    Qijun Xie
    Danyu Ni
    Sisi Chen
    Wenjie Zhang
    Jue Wang
    Xiufeng Ling
    Rong Shen
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 17
  • [9] The new standard for ovulation triggering should be GnRH agonist rather than hCG during controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bourdon, M.
    Peigne, M.
    Solignac, C.
    Darne, B.
    Languille, S.
    Pocate-Cheriet, K.
    Santulli, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 413 - 414
  • [10] GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist co-treated IVF/ICSI treatment cycles: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Youssef, M. A. F.
    Abdelmoty, Hatem I.
    Ahmed, Mohamed A. S.
    Elmohamady, Maged
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH, 2015, 6 (03) : 341 - 349