Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review

被引:4
|
作者
Oprea, Natalia [1 ]
Ardito, Vittoria [1 ]
Ciani, Oriana [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CeRGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, I-20136 Milan, Italy
关键词
Implementation; Patient decision aids; Shared decision-making; Breast cancer; PRISM framework; AIDS; WOMEN; RECONSTRUCTION; ACCEPTABILITY; PROGRAM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process whereby patients and clinicians jointly deliberate on the best treatment option that takes into account patients' preferences and values. In breast cancer care, different treatment options have become available to patients in the last decade. Various interventions, including patient decision aids (PtDAs), have been designed to promote SDM in this disease area. This study aimed at investigating the factors that influence the successful adoption and implementation of SDM interventions in real-world healthcare delivery settings.Methods A scoping review of scientific and grey literature was conducted for the period 2006-2021 to analyse the support for SDM interventions and their adoption in breast cancer clinical practice. The interpretation of findings was based on the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice.Results Overall, 19 studies were included for data synthesis, with more than 70% published since 2017. The availability of SDM tools does not automatically translate into their actual use in clinical settings. Factors related to users' co-creation, the clinical team's attitude and knowledge, organisational support and regulatory provisions facilitate the adoption of SDM interventions. However, overlooking aspects such as the re-organisation of care pathways, patient characteristics, and assigning of resources (human, financial, and facilities) can hinder implementation efforts.Conclusions Compared to the mounting evidence on the efficacy of SDM interventions, knowledge to support their sustained implementation in daily care is still limited, albeit results show an increasing interest in strategies that facilitate their uptake in breast cancer care over time. These findings highlight different strategies that can be used to embed SDM interventions in clinical practice. Future work should investigate which approaches are more effective in light of organisational conditions and external factors, including an evaluation of costs and healthcare system settings.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer
    Coyne, Imelda
    O'Mathuna, Donal P.
    Gibson, Faith
    Shields, Linda
    Sheaf, Greg
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (06):
  • [32] Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer
    Coyne, Imelda
    O'Mathuna, Donal P.
    Gibson, Faith
    Shields, Linda
    Leclercq, Edith
    Sheaf, Greg
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (11):
  • [33] Interventions for Promoting Participation in Shared Decision-Making for Children with Cancer: Update of a Cochrane Review
    Coyne, I.
    Gibson, F.
    Shields, L.
    Sheaf, G.
    Leclercq, E.
    O'Mathuna, D.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 : S224 - S224
  • [34] Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review
    Schuler, Katharina
    Jung, Ian-C.
    Zerlik, Maria
    Hahn, Waldemar
    Sedlmayr, Martin
    Sedlmayr, Brita
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [35] Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature
    DuBenske, Lori L.
    Schrager, Sarina B.
    Hitchcock, Mary E.
    Kane, Amanda K.
    Little, Terry A.
    McDowell, Helene E.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (10) : 1805 - 1814
  • [36] Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review
    Perron, M. E.
    Hudon, C.
    Roux-Levy, P. H.
    Poitras, M. E.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [37] Shared Decision-Making in Athletes Diagnosed With a Cardiovascular Condition: A Scoping Review
    Corneil, Heidi
    Liblik, Kiera
    Varghese, Sonu
    Masotti, Bruce
    Moulson, Nathaniel
    McKinney, Jimmy
    Allan, Katherine S.
    Johri, Amer
    Grubic, Nicholas
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [38] shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review
    Perron, Marie-Eve
    Poitras, Marie-Eve
    Hudon, Catherine
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22
  • [39] Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol
    Engels, Noel
    de Graav, Gretchen
    van der Nat, Paul
    van den Dorpel, Marinus
    Bos, Willem Jan
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [40] Embodied conversational agents for shared decision-making: a scoping review protocol
    Jiang, Hongzhan
    Li, Xuejing
    Meng, Meiqi
    Yang, Dan
    Wang, Ziyan
    Hao, Yufang
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):