Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis

被引:0
|
作者
Is, Enes Efe [1 ,2 ]
Aksu, Serkan [3 ,4 ]
Karamursel, Sacit [5 ]
Ketenci, Aysegul [6 ]
Sindel, Dilsad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci Turkiye, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Seyrantepe Campus,Cumhuriyet Ve Demokrasi Ave,Sari, TR-34485 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Physiol, Fac Med, Mugla, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Physiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Spinal stenosis; Brain stimulation; Chronic pain; Neurophysiology; Transcranial direct current stimulation; WALKING CAPACITY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; BACK-PAIN; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; SCALES; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-023-07248-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique for treating chronic pain, yet its effectiveness in chronic lower extremity pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has not been studied. This research aimed to investigate the impact of tDCS on pain, walking capacity, functional status, and quality of life in LSS patients.Patients and methodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, 32 LSS patients received either real or sham tDCS over the motor cortex contralateral to the patient's painful lower extremity for 10 consecutive weekdays (10 sessions). Evaluations were conducted at baseline, post-session, and 1-3 months later. The pain was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), walking duration and distance by Treadmill Walking Test, functional status by Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) and quality of life by Short Form-36 (SF-36).ResultsIn-group comparisons, active tDCS showed sustained analgesic effects for 3-month post-treatment, distinct from sham. After the final session, active group exhibited significantly better asymptomatic walking distance and duration. Active stimulation led to notably lower MOLBDQ scores after 1 month. Significant improvements in SF-36 subscales were seen after 3 months, especially in pain, physical functioning, and general health. Positive tDCS effects on pain, claudication, and some quality of life aspects were evident at 3 months, while functional status improvements were mainly limited to 1 month.ConclusiontDCS shows potential as a safe, non-invasive technique for alleviating chronic LSS-related pain, enhancing mobility, functionality, and quality of life.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03958526.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 782
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain
    Fenton, Bradford W.
    Fanning, James
    Fregni, Felipe
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 8S - 8S
  • [32] The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review
    Ferreira, Natalia R.
    Junqueira, Ygor N.
    Correa, Nathalia B.
    Fonseca, Estevao O.
    Brito, Nathalia B. M.
    Menezes, Thayna A.
    Magini, Marcio
    Fidalgo, Tatiana K. S.
    Ferreira, Daniele M. T. P.
    de Lima, Rodrigo L.
    Carvalho, Antonio C.
    DosSantos, Marcos F.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [33] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain and Physical Functions in Individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-controlled Study
    Is, Enes Efe
    Aksu, Serkan
    Karamursel, Sacit
    Ketenci, Aysegul
    Sindel, Dilsad
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2023, 237 : 63 - 63
  • [34] Transcranial direct current stimulation controls pain in traumatic spinal cord injury
    Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 2006, 2 (7): : 349 - 350
  • [36] Assessing the Impact of Neurogenic Claudication on Outcomes Following Decompression With Lumbar Interbody Fusions in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Martini, Michael L.
    Nistal, Dominic A.
    Deutsch, Brian C.
    Neifert, Sean N.
    Lamb, Colin D.
    Caridi, John M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (02) : 203 - 211
  • [37] What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Stuber, Kent
    Tomkins-Lane, Christy
    Schneider, Michael
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Furlan, Andrea D.
    Kennedy, Carol A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (06) : 1282 - 1301
  • [38] What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Carlo Ammendolia
    Kent Stuber
    Christy Tomkins-Lane
    Michael Schneider
    Y. Raja Rampersaud
    Andrea D. Furlan
    Carol A. Kennedy
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1282 - 1301
  • [39] Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Hofkirchner, Corey
    Plener, Joshua
    Bussieres, Andre
    Schneider, Michael J.
    Young, James J.
    Furlan, Andrea D.
    Stuber, Kent
    Ahmed, Aksa
    Cancelliere, Carol
    Adeboyejo, Aleisha
    Ornelas, Joseph
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [40] CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION USING A MULTIMODAL PROGRAM FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Chow, Ngai
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 38 (03) : 188 - 194