Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Yao, Yao [1 ]
Luo, Aoxiang [1 ]
Hao, Yanhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Stomatol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Stomatol, Shenzhen Hosp, 1120 Lianhua Rd, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Selective removal; Stepwise removal; Deep carious lesions; Meta-analysis; CARIES-REMOVAL; PERMANENT TEETH; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EXCAVATION; OUTCOMES; DENTIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2022.07.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Stepwise removal (SWR) and selective removal (SCR) are pro-posed techniques to treat deep carious lesions, but it is currently uncertain which technique is better. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of SCR and SWR for deep carious lesions in both primary and permanent teeth. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched until June 9, 2021. Success was the primary outcome. Sec-ondary outcomes included pulp exposure, tooth extraction, pulp necrosis, pulpitis, and end-odontic treatment. The effect size of each outcome was tested for heterogeneity. The source of heterogeneity was explored by meta regression analysis. Subgroup analysis and sensi-tivity analysis were conducted for the outcomes. Results: Nine studies of 1550 patients with 1929 deep carious teeth were included. SCR had a significantly higher success rate than SWR (pooled relative risk [RR] = 1.123, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.056-1.194, I2 = 52.3%, P < 0.001). The incidence of pulp exposure was signif-icantly lower in the SCR group than that in the SWR group (pooled RR = 0.266, 95%CI = 0.096-0.740, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.011). The incidence of pulp necrosis in the SCR group was approxi-mately 14.2% of that in the SWR group (pooled RR = 0.142, 95%CI = 0.026-0.789, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.026). Compared with SWR, SCR reduced the incidence of pulpitis by about 76.3% (pooled RR = 0.237, 95%CI = 0.090-0.623, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.003). Conclusion: SCR may be a better treatment for deep caries to achieve better outcomes than SWR. Future research on comparing SCR and SWR for different outcomes in deep carious lesions is warranted to confirm our findings. (c) 2022 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Satoru Shikata
    Yoshinori Noguchi
    Tsuguya Fukui
    Surgery Today, 2005, 35 : 553 - 560
  • [42] Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bai Nan
    Sun Chunguang
    Wang Jin
    Cai Yun
    Liang Beibei
    Zhang Lei
    Liu Youning
    Wang Rui
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (06) : 1118 - 1125
  • [43] Assisted Hatching—A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hassan N. Sallam
    Sameh S. Sadek
    Abdel Fattah Agameya
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 332 - 342
  • [44] Levosimendan versus dobutamine in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xuan Huang
    Shu Lei
    Mei-fei Zhu
    Rong-lin Jiang
    Li-quan Huang
    Guo-lian Xia
    Yi-hui Zhi
    Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 2013, 14 : 400 - 415
  • [45] Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lidija Kelava
    Hrvoje Barić
    Mladen Bušić
    Ivan Čima
    Vladimir Trkulja
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 1815 - 1839
  • [46] Early versus late tracheotomy in ICU patients A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Deng, Hongsheng
    Fang, Qiang
    Chen, Kun
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E24329
  • [47] LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Leichang
    Xie, Yufang
    Huang, Derong
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Wang, Wanchun
    Xiao, Huirong
    Zhong, Wu
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (03)
  • [48] Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Meng, Fanjie
    Pan, Xiangpo
    Tong, Wenzhen
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [49] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture versus Western Medicine in the Treatment of Insomnia
    Zhang, QianShi
    Dong, Xu
    Huo, Hong
    Cui, Yizhi
    Wang, Ruoyu
    Wang, Dongyan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 83 : 180 - 190
  • [50] Corticosteroid versus placebo injection for plantar fasciitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Zonghuan
    Yu, Aixi
    Qi, Baiwen
    Zhao, Yong
    Wang, Weiyang
    Li, Ping
    Ding, Junhui
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (06) : 2263 - 2268