Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Yao, Yao [1 ]
Luo, Aoxiang [1 ]
Hao, Yanhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Stomatol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Stomatol, Shenzhen Hosp, 1120 Lianhua Rd, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Selective removal; Stepwise removal; Deep carious lesions; Meta-analysis; CARIES-REMOVAL; PERMANENT TEETH; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EXCAVATION; OUTCOMES; DENTIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2022.07.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Stepwise removal (SWR) and selective removal (SCR) are pro-posed techniques to treat deep carious lesions, but it is currently uncertain which technique is better. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of SCR and SWR for deep carious lesions in both primary and permanent teeth. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched until June 9, 2021. Success was the primary outcome. Sec-ondary outcomes included pulp exposure, tooth extraction, pulp necrosis, pulpitis, and end-odontic treatment. The effect size of each outcome was tested for heterogeneity. The source of heterogeneity was explored by meta regression analysis. Subgroup analysis and sensi-tivity analysis were conducted for the outcomes. Results: Nine studies of 1550 patients with 1929 deep carious teeth were included. SCR had a significantly higher success rate than SWR (pooled relative risk [RR] = 1.123, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.056-1.194, I2 = 52.3%, P < 0.001). The incidence of pulp exposure was signif-icantly lower in the SCR group than that in the SWR group (pooled RR = 0.266, 95%CI = 0.096-0.740, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.011). The incidence of pulp necrosis in the SCR group was approxi-mately 14.2% of that in the SWR group (pooled RR = 0.142, 95%CI = 0.026-0.789, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.026). Compared with SWR, SCR reduced the incidence of pulpitis by about 76.3% (pooled RR = 0.237, 95%CI = 0.090-0.623, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.003). Conclusion: SCR may be a better treatment for deep caries to achieve better outcomes than SWR. Future research on comparing SCR and SWR for different outcomes in deep carious lesions is warranted to confirm our findings. (c) 2022 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep Carious Lesions Management with Stepwise, Selective, or Non-Selective Removal in Permanent Dentition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Figundio, Nicola
    Lopes, Pedro
    Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
    Fernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse
    Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira
    Mello-Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (16)
  • [2] Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a randomised controlled trial from Egypt-an interim analysis
    Labib, Mohamed E.
    Hassanein, Olfat E.
    Moussa, Makeen
    Yassen, Asmaa
    Schwendicke, Falk
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [3] Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 12-Months results of a randomized controlled pilot trial
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Finke, Christian
    Paris, Sebastian
    Reda, Seif
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Schwendicke, Falk
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 77 : 72 - 77
  • [4] Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 24 months follow-up from a randomized controlled trial
    Karim Elhennawy
    Christian Finke
    Sebastian Paris
    Seif Reda
    Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
    Falk Schwendicke
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 645 - 652
  • [5] Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 24 months follow-up from a randomized controlled trial
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Finke, Christian
    Paris, Sebastian
    Reda, Seif
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Schwendicke, Falk
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (02) : 645 - 652
  • [6] Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chen, Guohai
    Tzekov, Radouil
    Li, Wensheng
    Jiang, Fangzheng
    Mao, Sihong
    Tong, Yuhua
    CORNEA, 2016, 35 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [7] Selective removal to soft dentine versus full pulpotomy for management of proximal deep carious lesions - A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Rechithra, R.
    Wani, Wasim
    Sharma, Sidhartha
    Kumar, Vijay
    Chawla, Amrita
    Kalaivani, Mani
    Logani, Ajay
    CARIES RESEARCH, 2023, 57 (04) : 536 - 545
  • [8] Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials
    McLaughlin, J
    Bjornson, K
    Temkin, N
    Steinbok, P
    Wright, V
    Reiner, A
    Roberts, T
    Drake, J
    O'Donnell, M
    Rosenbaum, P
    Barber, T
    Ferrel, A
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2002, 44 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [9] Manual Removal versus Spontaneous Delivery of the Placenta at Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Meng-Chang
    Li, Peng
    Su, Wen-Jie
    Jiang, Rong
    Deng, Jia
    Wang, Ru-Rong
    Huang, Chao-Li
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 1283 - 1293
  • [10] Heterogeneity in a meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials versus observational studies
    Yuki Kotani
    Taihei Yamamoto
    Taisuke Shibata
    Yoshiro Hayashi
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2024, 50 : 480 - 482