A Novel Approach for the Assessment of Logistics Performance Index of EU Countries

被引:4
|
作者
Ju, Mali [2 ,3 ]
Mirovic, Ivan [4 ]
Petrovic, Vesna [4 ]
Erceg, Zivko [5 ]
Stevic, Zeljko [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Sch Ind Management Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Shihezi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shihezi, Peoples R China
[3] West Anhui Univ, Econ & Management Coll, Luan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ East Sarajevo, Fac Business Econ, Bijeljina, Bosnia & Herceg
[5] Univ East Sarajevo, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, Doboj, Bosnia & Herceg
关键词
logistics performance index; Fuzzy ROV method; EU; logistics; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1515/econ-2022-0074
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of logistics performance in the era of sustainable mobility on the overall economic development of a country is inevitable. It can even be said to represent an extremely important component in identifying economic conditions and provides the possibility of defining adequate strategies. In this article, the evaluation of the member countries of the European Union was carried out on the basis of the logistics performance index (LPI) according to the latest report of the World Bank (WB). A unique and original Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach has been created, and it involves the application of four methods: Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation, Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria, and Entropy and Fuzzy ROV (Range of Value). The weighting coefficients of six factors were obtained with the first three methods in crisp form, so they were converted into Triangular Fuzzy Number. The Fuzzy ROV method has been created for the first time in the literature and represents a great contribution from the methodological aspect. The results of the developed model and the applied steps show that there are certain differences in the rankings compared to the World Bank report, with a note that the best-ranked countries have maintained their positions. In addition, verification tests of the originally obtained results were created, with an emphasis on the importance of evaluation parameter values and their impact on the LPI ranking.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Logistics Performance Index: Methodological Issues
    Chakrabartty, Satyendra Nath
    FOREIGN TRADE REVIEW, 2020, 55 (04) : 466 - 477
  • [22] Proposals for improving the Logistics Performance Index
    Beysenbaev, Ruslan
    Dus, Yuri
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2020, 36 (01): : 34 - 42
  • [23] A DEA-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX
    Marti, Luisa
    Carlos Martin, Juan
    Puertas, Rosa
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (01) : 169 - 192
  • [24] AN ASSESSMENT OF CSR DISCLOSURE IN EU COUNTRIES
    Bendoraitiene, Evelina
    Butkus, Mindaugas
    GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, PTS I - VI, 2017, : 123 - 130
  • [25] Assessment of the Development of Poverty in EU Countries
    Sompolska-Rzechula, Agnieszka
    Kurdys-Kujawska, Agnieszka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [26] DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE OF COUNTRIES
    Moldabekova, Aisulu
    Philipp, Robert
    Reimers, Hans-Eggert
    Alikozhayev, Bauyrzhan
    TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL, 2021, 22 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [27] Alternative Approach to Wind Turbine Performance Index Assessment
    Ditkovich, Y.
    Kuperman, A.
    Yahalom, A.
    Byalsky, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (04)
  • [28] A Novel Approach for Performance Assessment in Knowledge Management
    Liu, Wei
    NINTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2010, : 2224 - 2228
  • [29] The Measurement of Economic, Social and Environmental Performance of Countries: A Novel Approach
    Maria Francesca Cracolici
    Miranda Cuffaro
    Peter Nijkamp
    Social Indicators Research, 2010, 95 : 339 - 356
  • [30] The Measurement of Economic, Social and Environmental Performance of Countries: A Novel Approach
    Cracolici, Maria Francesca
    Cuffaro, Miranda
    Nijkamp, Peter
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2010, 95 (02) : 339 - 356