Estimation of treatment effect among treatment responders with a time-to-event endpoint

被引:0
|
作者
Nordland, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Martinussen, Torben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Biostat, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
causal inference; compliance; efficient influence function; local average treatment effect; principal stratification; survival; treatment effect among responders; PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION; CAUSAL;
D O I
10.1111/sjos.12706
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In a placebo-controlled clinical study one may calculate the average treatment effect to convey the effect of the active treatment on some outcome. However, if it is speculated that the treatment only has an effect if the patient responds to the treatment defined by a certain biomarker response, then it is arguably more relevant to estimate the treatment effect among such responders. We present such a causal parameter that is based on principal stratification and is identified under the exclusion of a treatment effect among the nonresponders. We focus on time-to-event outcomes allowing for right censoring, and construct a doubly robust and efficient estimator based on the associated efficient influence function. The properties of the estimator are showcased in a simulation study and the methodology is applied to the Leader trial investigating the effect of liraglutide on the occurrence of cardiovascular events.
引用
收藏
页码:1161 / 1180
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sample size calculation for cluster randomization trials with a time-to-event endpoint
    Li, Jianghao
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (25) : 3608 - 3623
  • [22] Exploring the benefits of adaptive sequential designs in time-to-event endpoint settings
    Emerson, Sarah C.
    Rudser, Kyle D.
    Emerson, Scott S.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (11) : 1199 - 1217
  • [23] Comparison of statistical methodologies used to estimate the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes in observational studies
    Jreich, Rana
    Sebastien, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 31 (04) : 469 - 489
  • [24] Nested combination tests with a time-to-event endpoint using a short-term endpoint for design adaptations
    Joergens, Silke
    Wassmer, Gernot
    Koenig, Franz
    Posch, Martin
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 18 (03) : 329 - 350
  • [25] Intramuscular Corticosteroid Therapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Time-to-Event Analysis
    Chanprapaph, Kumutnart
    Pomsoong, Cherrin
    Kositkuljorn, Chaninan
    Suchonwanit, Poonkiat
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2022, 16 : 107 - 116
  • [26] Subgroup analysis of treatment effects for misclassified biomarkers with time-to-event data
    Wan, Fang
    Titman, Andrew C.
    Jaki, Thomas F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2019, 68 (05) : 1447 - 1463
  • [27] Heterogeneous treatment effects in stratified clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Beisel, Christina
    Benner, Axel
    Kunz, Christina
    Kopp-Schneider, Annette
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (03) : 511 - 530
  • [28] Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data
    Duy Ngo
    Baumgartner, Richard
    Mt-Isa, Shahrul
    Feng, Dai
    Chen, Jie
    Schnell, Patrick
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [29] Pitfall in the Design and Analysis of Comparative Oncology Trials With a Time-to-Event Endpoint and Recommendations
    McCaw, Zachary R.
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    Wei, Lee-Jen
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [30] Estimating the causal effect of a time-varying treatment on time-to-event using structural nested failure time models
    Lok, J
    Gill, R
    van der Vaart, A
    Robins, J
    [J]. STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2004, 58 (03) : 271 - 295