Checklist of Chilean Biological Collections

被引:0
|
作者
Ortiz, Juan C. [1 ]
Pizarro-Araya, Jaime [2 ,3 ]
Parra, Luis E. [1 ]
Marticorena, Alicia [4 ]
Jerez, Viviane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Nat & Oceanog, Dept Zool, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile
[2] Univ La Serena, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, Lab Entomol Ecol LEULS, Casilla 554, La Serena, Chile
[3] Inst Ecol & Biodiversidad IEB, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Nat & Oceanog, Dept Bot, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile
关键词
biological specimens; databases; digitization; natural history collections; BIODIVERSITY; CONCEPCION; UNIVERSIDAD; MAGALLANES; DIVERSITY; REGION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Biological collections are a fundamental tool both for scientific research and the conservation of biological diversity, which gives them a great scientific and cultural relevance. They allow the study of biodiversity and the analysis of evolutionary processes, as well as the identification and classification of species, essential aspects for making informed decisions regarding conservation. In addition to their scientific value, biological collections have an important cultural and heritage value for the country. We focused on providing a list of the biological collections present in Chile, the public and/or private institutions to which they belong, those that have been published in the literature and those that use the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The information was obtained by consulting curators, literature, and web pages. A total of 166 collections were registered of which 18 universities, 10 Natural History Museums, and 7 Research Centers are repositories. The University of Concepcion harbors the largest number of biological collections (25), followed by the University of Chile (23), and the National Museum of Natural History (18). At regional level, the Metropolitan region presents 48 collections, Biobio region 34, and Valparaiso region 29. A fundamental issue in the biological collections of Chile is the lack of financing to maintain their infrastructure and qualified staff and the absence of public access databases was discussed. Additionally, most of the collections surveyed did not have accessible digital information.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 196
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biological capacities of seven Chilean ferns
    Velasquez, Patricia
    Trucco, Josefina
    Munoz-Carvajal, Eduardo
    Bustos, Daniela
    Viteri, Rafael
    Montenegro, Gloria
    Giordano, Ady
    NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [22] Alien flora of DR Congo: improving the checklist with digitised herbarium collections
    Bordbar, Farzaneh
    Meerts, Pierre J.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2022, 24 (04) : 939 - 954
  • [23] IndCollections: biological specimens in Indian collections
    Chavan, V
    Rane, NS
    Ghate, HV
    Krishnan, S
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2005, 89 (09): : 1454 - 1455
  • [24] Utility of QR codes in biological collections
    Diazgranados, Mauricio
    Funk, Vicki A.
    PHYTOKEYS, 2013, 25 : 21 - 34
  • [25] Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene
    Meineke, Emily K.
    Davies, T. Jonathan
    Daru, Barnabas H.
    Davis, Charles C.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 374 (1763)
  • [26] A Smithsonian jewel: Biological collections [1]
    Miller, S.E.
    Science, 2001, 293 (5534)
  • [27] INFORMATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE IN BIOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS
    ORLOCI, L
    NATURE, 1969, 223 (5205) : 483 - +
  • [28] The disambiguation of people names in biological collections
    Groom, Quentin
    Brauchler, Christian
    Cubey, Robert
    Dillen, Mathias
    Huybrechts, Pieter
    Kearney, Nicole
    Klazenga, Niels
    Leachman, Siobhan
    Paul, Deborah L.
    Rogers, Heather
    Santos, Joaquim
    Shorthouse, David
    Vaughan, Alison
    von Mering, Sabine
    Haston, Elspeth
    BIODIVERSITY DATA JOURNAL, 2022, 10
  • [29] Museum collections - resources for biological monitoring
    Williams, K. A.
    AFRICAN INVERTEBRATES, 2010, 51 (01) : 219 - 221
  • [30] Should biological collections be exploited commercially?
    David Smith
    Nature Genetics, 2005, 37 (7) : 657 - 657