A Prospective Comparative Study of the Functional Outcomes of Patellar Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background and objectiveTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful surgical procedure. However, there is a lack of consensus about whether to resurface the patella or not. This study was aimed at evaluating the outcome of patellar resurfacing in terms of a decrease in the incidence of anterior knee pain after TKA and assessing whether patellar resurfacing is beneficial in improving functional outcomes. Materials and methodsThis prospective comparative study included 100 patients undergoing TKA who were randomly allotted to the patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing group. Functional evaluation was done based on the Knee Society Score, and the pain was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and after one year. ResultsThere was a significant improvement in the Knee Society scores as well as the pain scores in both groups postoperatively. The patellar resurfacing group showed statistically significant improvement as compared to the non-resurfacing group in the Knee Society clinical and functional scores as well as the VAS at the end of one year. ConclusionPatellar resurfacing during TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes as well as more relief from anterior knee pain as compared to non-resurfacing of the patella.