A framework to measure readiness and barriers for the implementation of Industry 4.0: A case approach

被引:19
|
作者
Govindan, Kannan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Arampatzis, Georgios [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, China Inst FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Danish Inst Adv Study, Ctr Sustainable Supply Chain Engn, Dept Technol & Innovat, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark
[3] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Woxsen Univ, Sch Business, Sadasivpet, Telangana, India
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Readiness; Barriers; DEMATEL; MCDM; Denmark; SUPPLY CHAIN; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; REVOLUTION; DRIVERS; LOGISTICS; MATURITY; CONTEXT; ENABLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101249
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Large businesses perceive the vital usefulness of Industry 4.0. They recognize how beneficial its implementation is to reinforce business competitiveness and to conserve, or even better, to increase their market share. Hence, top business management has embraced the challenge of the time: to evaluate the current level of digitization with the objective of proceeding to a full digitization phase in the future. With this concern, this paper proposes a framework to assist industries in promoting Industry 4.0 through two phases. In the initial phase, the case company's level of readiness is evaluated, and in the second phase, the barriers that exist within the implementation of Industry 4.0 (based on the company's readiness, obtained from the previous phase) are analyzed. Both phases have been carried out at a Danish case industry which is a third-tier supplier of anti-noise shims and back plates for manufacturers of disc brake linings. In the first phase, the assessment of readiness for Industry 4.0 demonstrates that the case industry is not fully ready; instead, they reside in the position of Industry 3.5 (in the middle of 3.0 and 4.0 revolutions). The limiting barriers to change for Industry 4.0 implementation are identified during the systematic literature review and analyzed using the DEMATEL method based on the industrial decision-makers' responses in the second phase. Moreover, the analysis demonstrates the most influential barrier category is the policy & organization category. The barrier "leadership" is considered the greater influencer of all since it responds in some way to almost all 21 barriers. Thus, leadership is the most significant barrier a company must overcome to adopt the Industry 4.0 concept. In addition, firms are challenged by the organizational changes that the adoption of Industry 4.0 will bring, and the tool of organizational change management will be handy.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Analytical Framework for Analysing Barriers for the Implementation of Industry 4.0
    Hariom
    Rajak, Sonu
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2024, 105 (03) : 401 - 416
  • [2] The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0
    Tadeu Pacchini, Athos Paulo
    Lucato, Wagner Cezar
    Facchini, Francesco
    Mummolo, Giovanni
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 113
  • [3] Assessment of Readiness for Industry 4.0 Implementation in Ceramic Industry
    Kellner, Tomas
    Necas, Martin
    Kanak, Michal
    Kyncl, Martin
    Kyncl, Jiri
    [J]. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 20 (06): : 763 - 770
  • [4] Readiness of Companies in Relation to Industry 4.0 Implementation
    Poor, Peter
    Basl, Josef
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, PT II, 2019, 2019, 9 : 236 - 248
  • [5] Industry 4.0 Implementation and Industry 5.0 Readiness in Industrial Enterprises
    Lachvajderova, Laura
    Kadarova, Jaroslava
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2022, 13 (03) : 102 - 109
  • [6] Industry 4.0 implementation barriers in automotive manufacturing industry: Interpretive structural modelling approach
    Ojha, Radhe Shyam
    Kumar, Amit
    Kumar, Vineet
    Raja, Avinash Ravi
    Singh, Sudesh
    [J]. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 2024, 32 (1-4): : 34 - 45
  • [7] A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study
    Cinar, Zeki Murat
    Zeeshan, Qasim
    Korhan, Orhan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [8] Investigating the Readiness Factors for Industry 4.0 Implementation for Manufacturing Industry in Egypt
    Khourshed, Nevien Farouk
    Elbarky, Sahar Sobhy
    Elgamal, Sarah
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [9] Interpretive framework by analysing the enablers for implementation of Industry 4.0: an ISM approach
    Devi, K. Sivananda
    Paranitharan, K. P.
    Agniveesh, A. Inigo
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2021, 32 (13-14) : 1494 - 1514
  • [10] Evaluating and Prioritizing the Barriers of Industry 4.0 Implementation in Indian SMEs: An ISM Approach
    Rawat, Pratish
    Yashpal
    Purohit, Jayant Kishor
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2024, 105 (03) : 543 - 560