Relationships between the surface roughness of Brazilian dimension stones and the adhesion to mortars

被引:2
|
作者
Ribeiro, Rogerio Pinto [1 ]
Moreiras, Sergio Trajano Franco [2 ]
Baldan, Victor Jose dos Santos [3 ]
Xavier, Gustavo de Castro [4 ]
Monteiro, Sergio N. [5 ]
de Azevedo, Afonso R. G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Ave Trabalhador Sao-Carlense 400, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Technol, Ave Angelo Moreira Fonseca 1800, BR-87506370 Umuarama, PR, Brazil
[3] Einstein Limeira, Fac Integradas, Rua Jatob 200, BR-13485203 Limeira, SP, Brazil
[4] UENF State Univ Northern Rio Janeiro UENF, LECIV Civil Engn Lab, Ave Alberto Lamengo 2000, BR-28013602 Campos Dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
[5] Mil Inst Engn IME, Dept Mat Sci, Praca Gen Tiburcio 80, BR-22290270 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Rocks for cladding; Block sawing; Diamond multiwires; Roughness of surface slabs; Adherent systems; STRENGTH; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01868
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The effect of different surface roughness for ceramic and metals on their adhesive bond strength is widely studied in the field of tribology, but still little investigated for stone claddings, which are natural and quite heterogeneous materials. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between the surface roughness of ornamental stone slabs and their adhesion to mortars were determined by TBS tensile bond strength tests, including observation of types of failure in each test. Slabs with different roughness of the migmatitic stone, commercially known as in Brazil "Jacarand ' a Rosado", were fixed with two types of adhesive mortars, one commercial and the other produced in the laboratory (here referred to as "PM" mortar). Average TBS adhesion values were higher for the rougher plates, as expected, since in this condition there is a larger exposed surface of the minerals, resulting in a greater number of electrochemical charges available to interact with the adhesive mortars. In quantitative terms, the results indicate average values of 1.39 MPa and 1.16 MPa, respectively, for the higher and lower roughness of specimens fixed with Commercial mortar. Regarding the adhesion for PM mortar, values obtained in specimens with smooth, moderately rough and rough surfaces, respectively, were, on average TBS of 2.06 MPa, 1.42 MPa and 1.47 MPa, values higher than for the CM mortar. Importantly, in these last two test conditions, all failures occurred in the stone, indicating that the PM mortar adhered very well to rougher surfaces, i.e., the stone and the standard substrate. So, it is plausible to consider that TBS values of the PM Mortar should be, in practical terms, higher than measured in the tests, since they reflected more conditions of the rock than the mortar. Such information indicates that detailed evaluation of the types of failure in the adhesion tests was important to corroborate the better TBS results for the mortar prepared in the laboratory with CPV-ARI cement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ADHESION BETWEEN METAL-SURFACES - THE EFFECT OF SURFACE-ROUGHNESS
    CHOWDHURY, SKR
    POLLOCK, HM
    WEAR, 1981, 66 (03) : 307 - 321
  • [22] Evaluation of surface roughness by various parameters .1. Relationships between several roughness parameters and tactile roughness
    Fujii, Y
    Yoshizane, M
    Okumura, S
    MOKUZAI GAKKAISHI, 1997, 43 (07): : 574 - 579
  • [23] A study of the adhesion between hydraulic mortars and concrete
    Aguiar, JB
    Cruz, MD
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 12 (11) : 1243 - 1251
  • [24] Role of surface roughness in capillary adhesion
    Ata, A
    Rabinovich, YI
    Singh, RK
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) : 337 - 346
  • [25] Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion
    Huber, Gerrit
    Gorb, Stanislav N.
    Hosoda, Naoe
    Spolenak, Ralph
    Arzt, Eduard
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2007, 3 (04) : 607 - 610
  • [26] Theory of adhesion: Role of surface roughness
    Persson, B. N. J.
    Scaraggi, M.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 141 (12):
  • [27] The influence of surface roughness on the adhesion force
    Meine, K
    Kloss, K
    Schneider, T
    Spaltmann, D
    SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2004, 36 (08) : 694 - 697
  • [28] Surface roughness effects onmicroparticle adhesion
    Cheng, W
    Dunn, PF
    Brach, RM
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2002, 78 (11): : 929 - 965
  • [29] EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON DUST ADHESION
    ZIMON, AD
    VOLKOVA, TS
    COLLOID JOURNAL-USSR, 1965, 27 (03): : 306 - &
  • [30] DETERMINATION OF THE ADHESION OF MORTARS AND OTHER SURFACE COATINGS.
    Anon
    Materiaux et constructions, 1983, 16 (91): : 53 - 56