What is the student experience of remote proctoring? A pragmatic scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Marano, E. [1 ]
Newton, P. M. [2 ]
Birch, Z. [1 ]
Croombs, M. [1 ]
Gilbert, C. [2 ]
Draper, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Hilary Rodham Clinton Sch Law, Swansea, Wales
[2] Swansea Univ, Med Sch, Singleton Pk Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales
关键词
automated proctoring; higher education; online assessment; online invigilation; online proctoring; Panopticon; proctoring; remote invigilation; student experience;
D O I
10.1111/hequ.12506
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Remote or online proctoring (invigilating) is a technology primarily used to improve the integrity of online examinations. The use of remote proctoring increased significantly as the world switched to online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote proctoring received negative media attention, including concerns about user privacy, discrimination and the accuracy of automated systems for detecting and reporting cheating. However, it is unclear whether these media concerns fully reflect the experiences of students. Online assessment offers a number of potential advantages to learners and education providers, and it seems likely that it is here to stay. It is essential to fully understand the learner experience of remote proctoring, with a view to ensuring it is as effective as possible while meeting the needs of all stakeholders, especially those being proctored. We undertook a scoping review of research into the student experience of online proctoring, with a pragmatic focus, aimed at developing guidance for higher education providers, based on the student experience. We reviewed primary research studies which evaluated the student experience of the use of remote proctoring for summative assessment in Higher Education. We used the Education Research Information Center database (ERIC) and Google Scholar. 21 papers were identified, from which the positives and negatives of the student experience were extracted, along with the main recommendations from the research. These were then synthesised into a series of summary recommendations by thematic analysis, by a team of researchers that included students and academic staff. We found that student experience was largely negative, influenced by concerns over privacy, technological challenges, fairness and stress. Recommendations were to include the student voice in decisions about how and why to use remote proctoring and limiting the use of remote proctoring. Working with students as partners and limiting the use of remote proctoring where possible, are key to ensuring a positive student experience.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1047
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Understanding the student experience with emergency remote teaching
    Wilcox, Bethany R.
    Vignal, Michael
    2020 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE (PERC), 2020, : 581 - 586
  • [22] Remote Cognitive Assessment in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review
    Lavigne, Katie
    Sauve, Genevieve
    Raucher-Chene, Delphine
    Guimond, Synthia
    Lepage, Martin
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 89 (09) : S130 - S130
  • [23] Remote leadership in health care: a scoping review
    Kiljunen, Mari
    Laukka, Elina
    Koskela, Tarja K.
    Kanste, Outi Ilona
    LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2022, 35 (01) : 98 - 115
  • [24] What's wrong with 'the student experience'?
    Sabri, Duna
    DISCOURSE-STUDIES IN THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF EDUCATION, 2011, 32 (05) : 657 - 667
  • [25] What is public health? a scoping review
    Razieh Azari
    Bettina Borisch
    Archives of Public Health, 81
  • [26] Pediatric apps: what are they for? A scoping review
    Nievas Soriano, Bruno Jose
    Uribe-Toril, Juan
    Ruiz-Real, Jose Luis
    Parron-Carreno, Tesifon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 181 (04) : 1321 - 1327
  • [27] Pediatric apps: what are they for? A scoping review
    Bruno José Nievas Soriano
    Juan Uribe-Toril
    José Luis Ruiz-Real
    Tesifón Parrón-Carreño
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 181 : 1321 - 1327
  • [28] What are green prescriptions? A scoping review
    Stanhope, Jessica
    Weinstein, Philip
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2023, 15 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [29] What is public health? a scoping review
    Azari, Razieh
    Borisch, Bettina
    ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 81 (01)
  • [30] Mood in Experience Design: A Scoping Review
    Peng, Zhuochao
    Desmet, Pieter M. A.
    Xue, Haian
    SHE JI-THE JOURNAL OF DESIGN ECONOMICS AND INNOVATION, 2023, 9 (03) : 330 - 378