What is the student experience of remote proctoring? A pragmatic scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Marano, E. [1 ]
Newton, P. M. [2 ]
Birch, Z. [1 ]
Croombs, M. [1 ]
Gilbert, C. [2 ]
Draper, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Hilary Rodham Clinton Sch Law, Swansea, Wales
[2] Swansea Univ, Med Sch, Singleton Pk Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales
关键词
automated proctoring; higher education; online assessment; online invigilation; online proctoring; Panopticon; proctoring; remote invigilation; student experience;
D O I
10.1111/hequ.12506
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Remote or online proctoring (invigilating) is a technology primarily used to improve the integrity of online examinations. The use of remote proctoring increased significantly as the world switched to online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote proctoring received negative media attention, including concerns about user privacy, discrimination and the accuracy of automated systems for detecting and reporting cheating. However, it is unclear whether these media concerns fully reflect the experiences of students. Online assessment offers a number of potential advantages to learners and education providers, and it seems likely that it is here to stay. It is essential to fully understand the learner experience of remote proctoring, with a view to ensuring it is as effective as possible while meeting the needs of all stakeholders, especially those being proctored. We undertook a scoping review of research into the student experience of online proctoring, with a pragmatic focus, aimed at developing guidance for higher education providers, based on the student experience. We reviewed primary research studies which evaluated the student experience of the use of remote proctoring for summative assessment in Higher Education. We used the Education Research Information Center database (ERIC) and Google Scholar. 21 papers were identified, from which the positives and negatives of the student experience were extracted, along with the main recommendations from the research. These were then synthesised into a series of summary recommendations by thematic analysis, by a team of researchers that included students and academic staff. We found that student experience was largely negative, influenced by concerns over privacy, technological challenges, fairness and stress. Recommendations were to include the student voice in decisions about how and why to use remote proctoring and limiting the use of remote proctoring. Working with students as partners and limiting the use of remote proctoring where possible, are key to ensuring a positive student experience.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1047
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote Proctoring: What Is the Takeaway From the Student Perspective?
    Furby, Leanne
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 42 (04) : 267 - 267
  • [2] Student engagement during emergency remote teaching: A scoping review
    Yang, Dong
    Wang, Huanhuan
    Metwally, Ahmed Hosny Saleh
    Huang, Ronghuai
    SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [3] Student engagement during emergency remote teaching: A scoping review
    Dong Yang
    Huanhuan Wang
    Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally
    Ronghuai Huang
    Smart Learning Environments, 10
  • [4] Student paramedic experience of transition into the workforce: A scoping review
    Kennedy, Sean
    Kenny, Amanda
    O'Meara, Peter
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (10) : 1037 - 1043
  • [5] Failing professional practice placements in allied health: What do we understand about the student experience? A scoping review
    Milgate, Wendy
    Copley, Jodie
    Hill, Jessica
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 29 (01) : 301 - 327
  • [6] Failing professional practice placements in allied health: What do we understand about the student experience? A scoping review
    Wendy Milgate
    Jodie Copley
    Jessica Hill
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2024, 29 : 301 - 327
  • [7] What Constitutes Student Well-Being: A Scoping Review Of Students’ Perspectives
    Saira Hossain
    Sue O’Neill
    Iva Strnadová
    Child Indicators Research, 2023, 16 : 447 - 483
  • [8] What Constitutes Student Well-Being: A Scoping Review Of Students' Perspectives
    Hossain, Saira
    O'Neill, Sue
    Strnadova, Iva
    CHILD INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (02) : 447 - 483
  • [9] Healthcare educators experience in supporting student well-being: A scoping review
    Psaila, Nicole
    Middleton, Rebekkah
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2025, 83
  • [10] "What Are the Applications for Remote Rehabilitation Management in Cystic Fibrosis?": A Scoping Review Protocol
    De Marchis, Matteo
    Cioeta, Matteo
    Cannataro, Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)