Comparison of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Use between Commercial, Medicare, and Medicare Advantage Enrollees

被引:3
|
作者
Hughes, Danny R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,11 ]
Chen, Jie [4 ]
Wallace, Alexandra E. [5 ]
Rajendra, Shubhsri [5 ]
Santavicca, Stefan [6 ]
Duszak Jr, Richard [7 ,8 ]
Rula, Elizabeth Y. [9 ]
Smith, Robert A. [10 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Econ, Hlth Econ & Analyt Lab, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] James Madison Univ, Dept Hlth Profess, Harrisonburg, VA USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Econ, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] OncoHealth, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Jackson, MS USA
[8] American Coll Radiol, Commiss Leadership & Practice Dev, Reston, VA USA
[9] Harvey L Neiman Hlth Policy Inst, Reston, VA USA
[10] American Canc Soc, Early Canc Detect Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[11] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, 550 N 3rd St,Suite 501, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
关键词
Commercial insurance; Lung cancer screening; Medicare; Medicare Advantage; SMALL-AREA ESTIMATION; MULTILEVEL REGRESSION; UNITED-STATES; DISPARITIES; RISK; POSTSTRATIFICATION; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2022.12.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Lung cancer screening does not require patient cost-sharing for insured people in the U.S. Little is known about whether other factors associated with patient selection into different insurance plans affect screening rates. We examined screening rates for enrollees in commercial, Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS), and Medicare Advantage plans. MethodS: County-level smoking rates from the 2017 County Health Rankings were used to estimate the number of enrollees eligible for lung cancer screening in two large retrospective claims databases covering: a 5% national sample of Medicare FFS enrollees; and 100% sample of enrollees associated with large commercial and Medicare Advantage carriers. Screening rates were estimated using observed claims, stratified by payer, before aggregation into national estimates by payer and demographics. Chi-square tests were used to examine differences in screening rates between payers. Results: There were 1,077,142 enrollees estimated to be eligible for screening. The overall estimated screening rate for enrollees by payer was 1.75% for commercial plans, 3.37% for Medicare FFS, and 4.56% for Medicare Advantage plans. Screening rates were estimated to be lowest among females (1.55%-4.02%), those aged 75-77 years (0.63%-2.87%), those residing in rural areas (1.88%3.56%), and those in the West (1.16%-3.65%). Among Medicare FFS enrollees, screening rates by race/ethnicity were non-Hispanic White (3.71%), non-Hispanic Black (2.17%) and Other (1.68%). Conclusions: Considerable variation exists in lung cancer screening between different payers and across patient characteristics. Efforts targeting historically vulnerable populations could present opportunities to increase screening.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Enrollees Report Less Positive Experiences Than Their Medicare Advantage Counterparts
    Elliott, Marc N.
    Landon, Bruce E.
    Zaslavsky, Alan M.
    Edwards, Carol
    Orr, Nathan
    Beckett, Megan K.
    Mallett, Joshua
    Cleary, Paul D.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (03) : 456 - 463
  • [42] UTILIZATION OF SERVICES IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE AND TRADITIONAL MEDICARE: A NATIONAL COMPARISON
    Landon, Bruce E.
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    Zavlavsky, Alan M.
    Ayanian, John Z.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 : S228 - S229
  • [43] Comparison of medicare risk HMO and FFS enrollees
    Murgolo, MS
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 2002, 24 (01): : 177 - 185
  • [44] Home Health Use In Medicare Advantage Compared To Use In Traditional Medicare
    Skopec, Laura
    Zuckerman, Stephen
    Aarons, Joshua
    Wissoker, Douglas
    Huckfeldt, Peter J.
    Feder, Judith
    Berenson, Robert A.
    Dey, Judith
    Oliveira, Lara
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (06) : 1072 - 1079
  • [45] ARE HOSPITAL INPATIENT COSTS LOWER FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ENROLLEES THAN MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE BENEFICIARIES?
    Karaca, Z.
    Wong, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A19 - A19
  • [46] A Comparison of Relative Resource Use and Quality in Medicare Advantage Health Plans Versus Traditional Medicare
    Landon, Bruce E.
    Zaslaysky, Alan M.
    Saunders, Robert
    Pawlson, L. Gregory
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    Ayanian, John Z.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2015, 21 (08): : 559 - +
  • [47] Use of Telemedicine for Buprenorphine Inductions in Patients With Commercial Insurance or Medicare Advantage
    Barsky, Benjamin A.
    Busch, Alisa B.
    Patel, Sadiq Y.
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    Huskamp, Haiden A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [48] ANNUAL HOSPITALIZATION FREQUENCY FOR PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE - A COMPARISON BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND MEDICARE ADVANTAGE POPULATION
    Patel, H.
    Maya, J.
    Song, R.
    Henk, H. J.
    Kielhorn, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A148 - A149
  • [49] Physician Reimbursement in Medicare Advantage Compared With Traditional Medicare and Commercial Health Insurance
    Trish, Erin
    Ginsburg, Paul
    Gascue, Laura
    Joyce, Geoffrey
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (09) : 1287 - 1295
  • [50] Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Commercial Insurance
    Starring, Hunter
    Waddell, William H.
    Steward, William
    Schexnayder, Stuart
    McKay, Jack
    Leonardi, Claudia
    Bronstone, Amy
    Dasa, Vinod
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (09) : 919 - 926