Mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion in women with previous caesarean delivery

被引:4
|
作者
Dickinson, Jan E. [1 ,3 ]
Doherty, Dorota A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Maternal Fetal Med, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Biostat & Res Design Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, King Edward Mem Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, 374 Bagot Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
关键词
caesarean section; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; second trimester; uterine rupture; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13653
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess clinical outcomes and complications in women with >= 1 prior caesarean delivery (CS) during mid-pregnancy medical abortion with misoprostol following mifepristone priming. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of abortions at 13-28 weeks gestation using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol at a single centre from 1/2008-12/2018. Procedural outcomes were compared between cases with no prior CS, one prior and >= 2 prior CS. Results: There were 1399 consecutive women who underwent a medical abortion, with 304 (21.7%) having >= 1 prior lower segment CS (241 one, 49 two, 12 three, one four) and one a prior classical CS. Median gestation was 19 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 17-21) among nulliparas, multiparas with no prior CS and multiparas with prior CS, P = 0.505. Compared with nulliparas (median procedural duration 10.8 h, IQR 7.5-16.5; adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.20 95%CI 1.04-1.40, P = 0.015), multiparas with prior CS had a shorter procedural duration (9.5 h, IQR 6.5-13.5) while multiparas with no CS had the shortest duration (7.0 h, IQR 5.0-9.8; aHR = 2.28 95%CI 2.01-2.58, P < 0.001). Complications were more frequent with prior CS: estimated blood loss (medians: 100 cc no CS vs 150 cc >= 1 CS, P = 0.002), blood loss >1000 cc (3.6% no CS vs 7.2% >= 1 CS; odds ratio (OR) >= 2.11 95%CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007) and placental retention (17.3% no CS vs 25.3% >= 1 CS; adjusted OR = 1.44 95%CI 1.05-1.99, P = 0.024). Uterine rupture occurred in 4/304 women with >= 1 prior CS (1.3%). Conclusions: Mifepristone-misoprostol abortion in women with prior CS is generally safe but associated with an increased risk of procedural complications. Lowering of the misoprostol dosage with prior CS may reduce uterine rupture, although this hypothesis requires ongoing research.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Misoprostol vs mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy
    Tripti N.
    Namrata S.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (6) : 659 - 662
  • [32] Misoprostol for second trimester abortion in women with prior uterine incisions
    Varras, M.
    Akrivis, Ch.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 37 (01): : 10 - 12
  • [33] Combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
    Kelesidou, Vera
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Virgiliou, Andriana
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [34] Experience and acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol among US women
    Beckman, LJ
    Harvey, SM
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 1997, 7 (04) : 253 - 262
  • [35] First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review
    Raymond, Elizabeth G.
    Shannon, Caitlin
    Weaver, Mark A.
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 87 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [36] Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Women with Prior Caesarean Section
    Mobusher, Iram
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 7 (01): : 130 - 132
  • [37] COMPARING COMPLICATIONS AND DELIVERY INTERVALS IN SECOND TRIMESTER LABOR INDUCTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL VS MISOPROSTOL ALONE
    Barker, E.
    Latta, K.
    Kendall, P.
    Laursen, L.
    McCloskey, L.
    York, S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (04) : 459 - 460
  • [38] Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone and gemeprost: a review of 956 cases
    Tang, OS
    Thong, KJ
    Baird, DT
    CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 64 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [39] Vaginal vs. sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone for cervical priming in second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation: a randomized clinical trial
    Carbonell, Josep Lluis
    Gallego, Francisca Garcia
    Llorente, Margardell Perez
    Bermudez, Santiago Barambio
    Sala, Eugenia Sanchez
    Gonzalez, Lidia Varela
    Texido, Carlos Sanchez
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (03) : 230 - 237
  • [40] Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean section
    Daskalakis, GJ
    Mesogitis, SA
    Papantoniou, NE
    Moulopoulos, GG
    Papapanagiotou, AA
    Antsaklis, AJ
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (01) : 97 - 99