Integrating Technology Adoption Models Into Implementation Science Methodologies: A Mixed-Methods Preimplementation Study

被引:6
|
作者
Gallant, Natasha L. [1 ,2 ]
Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Stopyn, Rhonda J. N. [1 ,2 ]
Feere, Emma K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Dept Psychol, 3737 Wascana Pkwy, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[2] Univ Regina, Ctr Aging & Hlth, 3737 Wascana Pkwy, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
来源
GERONTOLOGIST | 2023年 / 63卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Barriers; Facilitators; Health care settings; Patient-oriented technology; Technology adoption; CONSOLIDATED FRAMEWORK; READINESS; ACCEPTANCE; LOCUS;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnac098
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives Sustainable implementation of patient-oriented technologies in health care settings is challenging. Preimplementation studies guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) can provide opportunities to address barriers and leverage facilitators that can maximize the likelihood of successful implementation. When looking to implement patient-oriented technologies, preimplementation studies may also benefit from guidance from a conceptual framework specific to technology adoption such as the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. This study was, therefore, aimed at identifying determinants for the successful implementation of a patient-oriented technology (i.e., automated pain behavior monitoring [APBM] system) within a health care setting (i.e., long-term care [LTC] facility). Research Design and Methods Using a mixed-methods study design, 164 LTC nurses completed a set of questionnaires and 68 LTC staff participated in individual interviews involving their perceptions of an APBM system in LTC environments. Quantitative data were analyzed using a series of mediation analyses and narrative responses were examined using directed content analysis. Results Performance expectancy and effort expectancy partially and fully mediated the influence of implementation, readiness for organizational change, and technology readiness constructs on behavioral intentions to use the APBM system in LTC environments. Findings from the qualitative portion of this study provide guidance for the development of an intervention that is grounded in the CFIR. Discussion and Implications Based on our results, we offer recommendations for the implementation of patient-oriented technologies in health care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 427
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A longitudinal mixed-methods study on the impact and implementation of a school improvement policy initiative
    Fan, Xumei
    D'Amico, Leigh Kale
    Long, David
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2025,
  • [42] Serious Illness Conversations in advanced kidney disease: a mixed-methods implementation study
    Thamcharoen, Natanong
    Nissaisorakarn, Pitchaphon
    Cohen, Robert A.
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, : E928 - E935
  • [43] Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Geriatric Oncology Principles in Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Verduzco-Aguirre, Haydee C.
    Bolano Guerra, Laura M.
    Culakova, Eva
    Monroy Chargoy, Javier
    Martinez-Said, Hector
    Quintero Beulo, Gregorio
    Mohile, Supriya G.
    Soto-Perez-De-Celis, Enrique
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8
  • [44] Barriers to the adoption of routine surgical video recording: a mixed-methods qualitative study of a real-world implementation of a video recording platform
    Lam, Kyle
    Simister, Catherine
    Yiu, Andrew
    Kinross, James M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (10): : 5793 - 5802
  • [45] Barriers to integrating direct oral anticoagulants into anticoagulation clinic care: A mixed-methods study
    Barnes, Geoffrey D.
    Acosta, Jennifer
    Graves, Christopher
    Puroll, Eric
    Kline-Rogers, Eva
    Gu, Xiaokui
    Townsend, Kevin
    McMahon, Ellen
    Craig, Terri
    Froehlich, James B.
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2019, 3 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [46] Integrating digital behavioural therapy for insomnia into primary care: A feasibility mixed-methods study
    Gordon, Christopher J.
    Cheung, Janet M. Y.
    Schrire, Zoe Menzel
    Rahimi, Matthew
    Aji, Melissa
    Salomon, Helena
    Doggett, Iliana
    Glozier, Nick
    Wong, Keith K. H.
    Marshall, Nathaniel S.
    Bartlett, Delwyn J.
    Grunstein, Ron R.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [47] Integrating Human Augmentation in the Defence Sphere: an Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on Ethical Principles
    Miron, Marina
    Sattler, Sebastian
    Whetham, David
    Auzanneau, Margaux
    Kolstoe, Simon E.
    NEUROETHICS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [48] A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
    Solomon, Erin D.
    Repice, Michelle D.
    Mutambuki, Jacinta M.
    Leonard, Denise A.
    Cohen, Cheryl A.
    Luo, Jia
    Frey, Regina F.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 17 (02):
  • [49] The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective
    Matos, Pedro Verga
    Romao, Mario
    Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda
    Abaladas, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 101 : 651 - 659
  • [50] Is team science valued in the academic promotions process? A mixed-methods case study
    Potter, Michael B.
    Mansur, Saji
    Rutman, Shira P.
    Brindis, Claire D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8 (01)