Outcomes of a novel algorithm for levator muscle plication surgery in congenital blepharoptosis

被引:0
|
作者
Kotb, Ahmed N. [1 ]
Salamah, Moustafa A. [1 ]
Khalil, Ahmad S. [1 ]
Dessouky, Reem Amir Kamal [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Zagazig, Egypt
关键词
Nomogram; Levator plication; Congenital ptosis; RESECTION; PTOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-024-03287-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim to assess the outcomes of a novel algorithm for the calculation of the amount levator muscle plication in congenital blepharoptosis surgery.Methods this retrospective comparative study included 34 patients with congenital ptosis subjected to levator muscle plication surgery during the period from October 2021 to November 2022. They were divided into two groups. Group A: the amount of levator muscle plication was calculated by a traditional formula [(amount of ptosis x 3) + 9 mm in cases with good levator function or (amount of ptosis x 3) + 11 mm in cases with fair levator function]. Group B: the amount of levator muscle plication was calculated by a novel nomogram [the result of the traditional formula was modified by subtracting 4 mm if the calculated amount was >= 15 mm or subtracting 3 mm if the calculated amount was < 15 mm]. Demographic data, baseline ptosis characteristics and postoperative results at 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month were compared between the groups. Primary outcome measure was postoperative Marginal Reflex Distance (MRD1). Secondary outcome measures were lid contour, lid crease and any reported complications.Results Group A included 20 eyes of 18 patients while Group B included 20 eyes of 16 patients. The mean amount of levator muscle plication was 16.98 +/- 2.44 mm and 13.48 +/- 2.42 mm in group A and group B respectively. The difference between the two groups was highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). Mean MRD1 at the 1st postoperative week was 4.95 +/- 0.37 mm in group A and 4.08 +/- 0.64 mm in group B. This difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Overcorrection was seen in 8 (40%) eyes in group A and 1 (5%) eye in group B. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.008). Undercorrection was seen in only 1 (5%) eye in group B. No other complications were reported. Surgical success was achieved in 12 (60%) eyes in group A versus 18 (90%) eyes in group B. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03).Conclusion our novel nomogram for the calculation of the amount levator muscle plication in congenital blepharoptosis surgery is effective in achieving a satisfactory postoperative MRD1.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Using Standard Variables Following Levator-Mullerectomy Advancement Blepharoptosis Surgery
    Dryden, Stephen C.
    Rho, Jonathan E.
    Fowler, Samuel C.
    Gannon, Edwin W.
    Houser, Kourtney H.
    Fleming, James C.
    Fowler, Brian T.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : E554 - E556
  • [42] Balanced Plication of Muller Muscle Tendon Through Conjunctiva for Blepharoptosis Correction
    Lee, Eun Jung
    Hwang, Kun
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 599 - 601
  • [43] Levator Plication versus Resection in Congenital Ptosis - A Prospective Comparative Study
    Kumar, Sushil
    Kamal, Saurabh
    Kohli, Vandana
    ORBIT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS AND FACIAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 29 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [44] SIMPLIFIED LEVATOR PALPEBRAE SUPERIORIS MUSCLE RECESSION TO TREAT OVERCORRECTED BLEPHAROPTOSIS
    PUTTERMAN, AM
    URIST, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1974, 77 (03) : 358 - 366
  • [45] Surgical anatomy and histology of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle for blepharoptosis correction
    Djordjevic, Boban
    Novakovic, Marijan
    Milisavljevic, Milan
    Milicevic, Sasa
    Malikovic, Aleksandar
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2013, 70 (12) : 1124 - 1131
  • [46] Conjoint fascial sheath suspension with levator muscle advancement for severe blepharoptosis
    Qiu, Yucheng
    Jin, Rui
    Dong, Xue
    Shen, Yirui
    Ding, Feixue
    Deng, Zhizhong
    Zhou, Xianyu
    Ning, Youcong
    Yang, Jun
    Liu, Fei
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2023, 57 (1-6) : 533 - 538
  • [47] Comparison of levator resection and frontalis muscle transfer in the treatment of severe blepharoptosis
    Park, Dae Hwan
    Choi, Won Seok
    Yoon, Sean Hyuck
    Shim, Jung Soo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 59 (04) : 388 - 392
  • [48] Invited Response to the Letter on "Modified Levator Resection Technique for Moderate Congenital Blepharoptosis"
    Cang, Zheng-Qiang
    Song, Bao-Qiang
    Liu, Chao-Hua
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 49 (5) : 1610 - 1611
  • [49] Unilateral Congenital Blepharoptosis Repair by Anterior Levator Advancement and Resection: An Educational Review
    Harvey, Donald J.
    Iamphongsai, Seree
    Gosain, Arun K.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (04) : 1325 - 1331
  • [50] The Type and Content of Collagen Fibers of the Levator Aponeurosis in Patients With Simple Congenital Blepharoptosis
    Miao, Xiaoteng
    Shan, Tao
    Wang, Jiaqi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (02) : E182 - E184