Optimizing the Isoprene Emission Model MEGAN With Satellite and Ground-Based Observational Constraints

被引:5
|
作者
DiMaria, Christian A. A. [1 ]
Jones, Dylan B. A. [1 ]
Worden, Helen [2 ]
Bloom, A. Anthony [3 ]
Bowman, Kevin [3 ]
Stavrakou, Trissevgeni [4 ]
Miyazaki, Kazuyuki [3 ]
Worden, John [3 ]
Guenther, Alex [5 ]
Sarkar, Chinmoy [5 ]
Seco, Roger [6 ]
Park, Jeong-Hoo [7 ]
Tota, Julio [8 ]
Alves, Eliane Gomes [9 ]
Ferracci, Valerio [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Atmospher Chem Observat & Modeling Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[3] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Royal Belgian Inst Space Aeron BIRA IASB, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Inst Environm Assessment & Water Res IDAEA CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Natl Inst Environm Res, Air Qual Res Div, Incheon, South Korea
[8] UFOPA, Univ Fed Oeste Para, Inst Engn & Geociencias, Santarem, Brazil
[9] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Dept Biogeochem Proc, Jena, Germany
[10] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water, Energy & Environm, Cranfield, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
isoprene emissions; model-data fusion; model optimization; remote sensing; eddy covariance; Monte Carlo algorithm; AIRBORNE FLUX MEASUREMENTS; FORMALDEHYDE COLUMNS; BIOGENIC ISOPRENE; RATE VARIABILITY; CARBON; SENSITIVITY; INVERSION; DROUGHT; IMPACT; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1029/2022JD037822
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Isoprene is a hydrocarbon emitted in large quantities by terrestrial vegetation. It is a precursor to several air quality and climate pollutants including ozone. Emission rates vary with plant species and environmental conditions. This variability can be modeled using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). MEGAN parameterizes isoprene emission rates as a vegetation-specific standard rate which is modulated by scaling factors that depend on meteorological and environmental driving variables. Recent experiments have identified large uncertainties in the MEGAN temperature response parameterization, while the emission rates under standard conditions are poorly constrained in some regions due to a lack of representative measurements and uncertainties in landcover. In this study, we use Bayesian model-data fusion to optimize the MEGAN temperature response and standard emission rates using satellite-and ground-based observational constraints. Optimization of the standard emission rate with satellite constraints reduced model biases but was highly sensitive to model input errors and drought stress and was found to be inconsistent with ground-based constraints at an Amazonian field site, reflecting large uncertainties in the satellite-based emissions. Optimization of the temperature response with ground-based constraints increased the temperature sensitivity of the model by a factor of five at an Amazonian field site but had no impact at a UK field site, demonstrating significant ecosystem-dependent variability of the isoprene emission temperature sensitivity. Ground-based measurements of isoprene across a wide range of ecosystems will be key for obtaining an accurate representation of isoprene emission temperature sensitivity in global biogeochemical models.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements of ultraviolet radiation exposures near the ground
    Nerushev, AF
    Tereb, NV
    IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 2308 - 2310
  • [32] Comparing meteorological spaceborne and ground-based radars: optimal satellite overpass distance from a ground-based radar site
    Gabella, Marco
    Duque, David
    Notarpietro, Riccardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 33 (01) : 322 - 330
  • [33] MODELING ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION FOR CMB GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS
    Errard, J.
    Ade, P. A. R.
    Akiba, Y.
    Arnold, K.
    Atlas, M.
    Baccigalupi, C.
    Barron, D.
    Boettger, D.
    Borrill, J.
    Chapman, S.
    Chinone, Y.
    Cukierman, A.
    Delabrouille, J.
    Dobbs, M.
    Ducout, A.
    Elleflot, T.
    Fabbian, G.
    Feng, C.
    Feeney, S.
    Gilbert, A.
    Goeckner-Wald, N.
    Halverson, N. W.
    Hasegawa, M.
    Hattori, K.
    Hazumi, M.
    Hill, C.
    Holzapfel, W. L.
    Hori, Y.
    Inoue, Y.
    Jaehnig, G. C.
    Jaffe, A. H.
    Jeong, O.
    Katayama, N.
    Kaufman, J.
    Keating, B.
    Kermish, Z.
    Keskitalo, R.
    Kisner, T.
    Le Jeune, M.
    Lee, A. T.
    Leitch, E. M.
    Leon, D.
    Linder, E.
    Matsuda, F.
    Matsumura, T.
    Miller, N. J.
    Myers, M. J.
    Navaroli, M.
    Nishino, H.
    Okamura, T.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 809 (01):
  • [35] Comparison of satellite-based and ground-based radar observations of precipitation
    Bolen, Steven M.
    Chandrasekar, V.
    Conference on Radar Meteorology, 1999, : 751 - 753
  • [36] OBSERVATIONAL SELECTION EFFECTS WITH GROUND-BASED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
    Chen, Hsin-Yu
    Essick, Reed
    Vitale, Salvatore
    Holz, Daniel E.
    Katsavounidis, Erik
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 835 (01):
  • [37] GROUND-BASED ATMOSPHERIC INFRARED AND VISIBLE EMISSION MEASUREMENTS
    BAKER, DJ
    STEED, AJ
    WARE, GA
    OFFERMANN, D
    LANGE, G
    LAUCHE, H
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1985, 47 (1-3): : 133 - 145
  • [38] THE ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION OF MARS - ISM AND GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONAL DATA
    ENCRENAZ, T
    LELLOUCH, E
    ROSENQVIST, J
    DROSSART, P
    COMBES, M
    BILLEBAUD, F
    DEPATER, I
    GULKIS, S
    MAILLARD, JP
    PAUBERT, G
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE-ATMOSPHERES HYDROSPHERES AND SPACE SCIENCES, 1991, 9 (12): : 797 - 803
  • [39] Ground-Based Observational Support for Spacecraft Exploration of the Outer Planets
    Orton, Glenn S.
    EARTH MOON AND PLANETS, 2009, 105 (2-4): : 143 - 152
  • [40] Ground-Based Observational Support for Spacecraft Exploration of the Outer Planets
    Glenn S. Orton
    Earth, Moon, and Planets, 2009, 105 : 143 - 152