Collective choice with heterogeneous time preferences

被引:4
|
作者
Pakhnin, Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] European Univ, Dept Econ, St Petersburg, Russia
[2] CESifo Res Network Affiliate, Munich, Germany
关键词
collective decisions; heterogeneous agents; social discount rate; social welfare function; time consistency; voting; DISTANT FUTURE; OPTIMAL-GROWTH; DYNAMIC-MODEL; EQUILIBRIUM; POLICY; AGENTS; CONSISTENCY; TURNPIKE; PATIENCE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/joes.12516
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reviews recent research on the aggregation of heterogeneous time preferences. Main results are illustrated in a simple Ramsey model with many agents with additively time-separable utility functions who differ in their discount factors. We employ an intertemporal view on this model and argue that preferences of a decision maker should be represented by a sequence of utility functions. This allows us to clarify the issue of dynamic inconsistency and relate it to simple properties of discounting. We distinguish between private and common consumption cases. In the private consumption case, we discuss the properties of sequences of additively time-separable social welfare functions (SWFs) and explain why the notion of Pareto optimality under heterogeneous time preferences becomes problematic. In the common consumption case, we focus on the problem of collective choice under heterogeneous time preferences, discuss the difficulties with dynamic voting procedures, and review some ways to overcome them. We conclude by highlighting the implications of our discussion for the problem of choosing an appropriate social discount rate (SDR).
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 746
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual and collective choice and voting in common pool resource problem with heterogeneous actors
    Margreiter, M
    Sutter, M
    Dittrich, D
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 (02): : 241 - 271
  • [32] Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Ostermann, Jan
    Muehlbacher, Axel
    Brown, Derek S.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Hobbie, Amy
    Weinhold, Andrew
    Alshareef, Noor
    Derrick, Caroline
    Thielman, Nathan M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (07) : 851 - 861
  • [33] Understanding heterogeneous preferences of hotel choice attributes: Do customer segments matter?
    Kim, Dohee
    Hong, Sukhwa
    Park, Byung-Jin
    Kim, Inyoung
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 45 : 330 - 337
  • [34] Collective choice rules under linguistic preferences: An example of the computing with words/perceptions paradigm
    Kacprzyk, J
    Zadrozny, S
    NINTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2000), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 786 - 791
  • [35] COLLECTIVE CHOICE OF WORKING TIME, PUBLIC CONSUMPTION AND LINDAHL EQUILIBRIUM
    Donni, Olivier
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2007, 58 (03): : 535 - 543
  • [36] Social Time Preferences for Health and Money Elicited with a Choice Experiment
    Meerding, Willem Jan
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    Stuifbergen, Marja C.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (04) : 368 - 374
  • [37] Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment
    De Marchi, Elisa
    Caputo, Vincenzina
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    Banterle, Alessandro
    FOOD POLICY, 2016, 62 : 99 - 109
  • [38] Choice reversal without temptation: A dynamic experiment on time preferences
    Casari, Marco
    Dragone, Davide
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2015, 50 (02) : 119 - 140
  • [39] Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments
    van der Pol, M
    Cairns, J
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) : 1459 - 1470
  • [40] Choice reversal without temptation: A dynamic experiment on time preferences
    Marco Casari
    Davide Dragone
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2015, 50 : 119 - 140