Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restorations to dentin

被引:0
|
作者
Elmenshawy, Marwa Z. [1 ]
El-Haliem, Huda Abed [1 ]
Mowafy, Amr M. [2 ,3 ]
Hamama, Hamdi H. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Bot Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] New Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol Sci, New Mansoura, Egypt
[4] New Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, New Mansoura, Egypt
[5] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
关键词
Ethanolic extract of propolis; glass ionomer; antibacterial properties; Streptococcus mutans and microshear bond strength; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; CHLORHEXIDINE; CEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23710
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass ionomer restorations to dentin. Materials and methods: Conventional glass ionomer cement (Equia forte, GC Tokyo, Japan), resinmodified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC, GC Tokyo, Japan) and propolis powder (dried extract from honey bees) materials were used in this study. Both conventional glass ionomer and resinmodified glass ionomer were modified by two different concentrations of ethanolic extract of propolis (10 % and 25 % EEP). For antibacterial test, Streptococcus mutans strain was spread on agar petri dishes using a sterile swab. Discs of both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were fabricated within the agar plates. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the inhibition zones around each disc. For microshear bond strength test, 60 healthy human permanent molars were prepared by cutting occlusal surface and expose the dentin at the height of contour of all teeth then conditioned using poly acrylic acid conditioner, both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were mixed and applied on conditioned dentin surface by using tygon tube. Microshear bond strength was evaluated by the universal testing machine. Results: Two-way ANOVA test revealed that both glass ionomer type and different concentrations of EEP had significant effect on the antibacterial test results and microshear bond strength values (p < 0,05). Glass ionomer restorative material with 25%EEP had the highest antibacterial values whereas glass ionomer restorative material without modifications (control groups) had the lowest values. Resin-modified glass ionomer without any modification (control group) had the highest bond strength while resin-modified glass ionomer with 25%EEP had the lowest bond strength. Conclusions: Incorporation of ethanolic extract of propolis to glass ionomer restorative material increases the antibacterial effects of both conventional GIC and RMGI. Inspite of this advantage, it seems that it has deleterious effect on microshear bond strength to dentin.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of dentin age on the microshear bond strength and microleakage of glass-ionomer cements
    Techa-ungkul, Chutima
    Sakoolnamarka, Rangsima
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2021, 38 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [2] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF A VLC GLASS-IONOMER TO DENTIN
    FERREIRA, MR
    BRUNI, NB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (04) : 723 - 723
  • [3] GLASS-IONOMER INSERTION TIME AND BOND-STRENGTH TO DENTIN
    FINOCCHIETTI, PI
    EDELBERG, MH
    BEIGELIS, AA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (04) : 815 - 815
  • [4] BOND STRENGTH OF MODERN GLASS-IONOMER RESIN MATERIALS TO DENTIN
    VANDERVYVER, PJ
    VANRENSBURG, JMJ
    DEWET, FA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 1016 - 1016
  • [5] EFFECT OF DENTINAL PRETREATMENT ON BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT AND DENTIN
    JOYNT, RB
    DAVIS, EL
    WIECZKOWSKI, G
    PIERCE, L
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1990, 15 (05) : 173 - 177
  • [6] Mineralization in bovine dentin adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations
    Hotta, M
    Li, Y
    Sekine, I
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 29 (03) : 211 - 215
  • [7] Dentin conditioning and microleakage of glass-ionomer restorations.
    Witte, M
    Troendle, K
    O'Haver, W
    Mejia, A
    Titus, H
    Garcia-Godoy, F
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 437 - 437
  • [8] DENTIN BOND STRENGTH OF LIGHT-CURED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS
    HINOURA, K
    MIYAZAKI, M
    ONOSE, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1991, 70 (12) : 1542 - 1544
  • [9] Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin
    Palma-Dibb, RG
    de Castro, CG
    Ramos, RP
    Chimello, DT
    Chinelatti, MA
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2003, 5 (01): : 57 - 62
  • [10] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN OF RESIN-REINFORCED GLASS-IONOMER
    TRIANA, R
    PRADO, C
    LLENA, C
    FORNER, L
    GARRO, J
    GARCIAGODOY, F
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 328 - 328