TrustSys: Trusted Decision Making Scheme for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence of Things

被引:8
|
作者
Rathee, Geetanjali [1 ]
Garg, Sahil [2 ]
Kaddoum, Georges [3 ]
Choi, Bong Jun [4 ,5 ]
Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi [6 ,7 ]
AlQahtani, Salman A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Netaji Subhas Univ Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Delhi 110078, India
[2] Ecole Technol Super, Resilient Machine Learning Inst ReMI, Montreal, PQ H3C 1 K3, Canada
[3] Ecole Technol Super, Elect Engn Dept, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
[4] Soongsil Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 06978, South Korea
[5] Soongsil Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Seoul 06978, South Korea
[6] King Saud Univ, Informat Syst Dept, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[7] King Saud Univ, Res Chair New Emerging Technol & 5G Networks & Be, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[8] King Saud Univ, Res Chair New Emerging Technol & 5G Networks & Be, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Security; Internet of Things; Decision making; Real-time systems; Monitoring; Bayes methods; Backpropagation; Bayesian's classification; decision-making scheme; secure AIoT; trusted collaborative AIoT; ENERGY-EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2022.3173006
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many IoT-based applications have inherited the artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) techniques to explore new services and benefits of smart recording and monitoring generated information. However, hundreds of hacking incidents caused by highly sophisticated attackers have generated serious risks, where they compromised various IoT sensors for their benefits, impeding the growth of AIoT. Various security schemes have been proposed in the literature; however, it is critical to determine the legitimacy of AIoT devices in real-time scenarios during the initial deployment of the network. Therefore, this article aims to provide a secure, reliable, and trusted decision-making scheme using multiattribute methods in collaborative AIoT. The proposed system uses backpropagation and Bayesian's rule to ensure a fast and accurate decision. In addition, agent-based modeling and population-based modeling trust schemes are used to compute the legitimacy of the communicating model. Further, the proposed system is validated over various security measures against the various decision-based conventional methods such as Fuzzy c-means, REPTree, and random tree in terms of time, accuracy, replay attack, data falsification attack, recall, region of convergence, and F-Measure. The proposed mechanism achieves 93% improvement over accuracy and attack identification against existing mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1068
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    Filiberto, Amanda C.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Brakenridge, Scott C.
    Mohr, Alicia M.
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Bihorac, Azra
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [22] Decision Making in Internet of Vehicles Using Pervasive Trusted Computing Scheme
    Rathee, Geetanjali
    Iqbal, Razi
    Khelifi, Adel
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 68 (02): : 2755 - 2769
  • [23] National Costume Art Design Optimization under the Background of Artificial Intelligence Decision Making and Internet of Things
    Peng, Yu
    Krutasaen, Watanapun
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [24] Memory-Assistant Collaborative Language Understanding for Artificial Intelligence of Things
    Yan, Ming
    Chen, Cen
    Du, Jiawei
    Peng, Xi
    Zhou, Joey Tianyi
    Zeng, Zeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 18 (05) : 3349 - 3357
  • [25] Use of Artificial Intelligence in Regulatory Decision-Making
    Jago, Robert
    Gaag, Anna van der
    Stathis, Kostas
    Petej, Ivan
    Lertvittayakumjorn, Piyawat
    Krishnamurthy, Yamuna
    Gao, Yang
    Silva, Juan Caceres
    Webster, Michelle
    Gallagher, Ann
    Austin, Zubin
    JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 11 - 19
  • [26] Can clinical decision making be enhanced by artificial intelligence?
    Janda, M.
    Soyer, H. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 180 (02) : 247 - 248
  • [27] Algorithms and Decision-Making in Military Artificial Intelligence
    Garcia, Denise
    GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2024, 38 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [28] Improving Group Decision-Making by Artificial Intelligence
    Xia, Lirong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 5156 - 5160
  • [29] Public Decision Making Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Crowds
    Liu, Helen K.
    Tang, MuhChyun
    Chen, Kuang-hua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2020, 2020, : 214 - 222
  • [30] Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence
    Earp, Brian D.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 48 (05) : 287 - 289