Incorporation of radial basis function with Gorilla Troops Optimization and Moth-Flame Optimization to predict the compressive strength of high-performance concrete

被引:5
|
作者
Zhao, Jin [1 ]
Wu, Tingting [2 ]
Li, Jun [3 ]
Shi, Liying [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Business & Technol Coll, Network Construct & Informat Management Ctr, Changchun 130507, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Vocat Coll Sci & Technol, Weifang 261053, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Vocat Coll Econ & Trade, Weifang 261011, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Business & Technol Coll, Coll Engn, Changchun 130507, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
High-performance concrete; Compressive strength; Gorilla Troops Optimization; Moth-Flame Optimization; Radial basis function; FLY-ASH; SILICA FUME; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; MODEL; RATIO;
D O I
10.1007/s41939-023-00169-6
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Current trends in modern research revolve around new technologies that can predict material properties without the expense of time, effort, and experimentation. Adapting machine learning methods to calculate various attributes of materials is receiving increasing attention. This study aims to forecast the 28-day compressive strength of high-performance concrete using both stand-alone and compound machine learning techniques. To this end, a stand-alone radial basis function and two ensemble optimizers, Gorilla Troops Optimization and Moth-Flame Optimization, have been applied. The R-2 (coefficient of determination), RMSE (root mean absolute error), MAE (mean absolute error), SI (scatter index), and NRMSE (normalized root mean squared error) cross-validation were used to validate the performance of each model. In addition, the input parameters' contribution to the outcomes' forecast is specified by using a sensitivity analysis. All techniques used have proven to show improved performance in predicting results. The RBF-MFO model was the most accurate, with an R-2 value of 0.996, compared to the RBF-GTO, with an R-2 value of 0.987. Moreover, in the RBF-MFO index, RMSE = 0.937, NRMSE = 0.0149, MAE = 0.1875, and SI = 0.0149. On the other hand, for the combined RBF-GTO model, RMSE = 1.9588, NRMSE = 0.0304, MAE = 0.8111, and SI = 0.0304. Based on the data obtained, it is clear that the combined RBF-MFO model has achieved better performance.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条