Improving global hydrological simulations through bias-correction and multi-model blending

被引:8
|
作者
Chevuturi, Amulya [1 ]
Tanguy, Maliko [1 ]
Facer-Childs, Katie [1 ]
Martinez-de la Torre, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Sunita [1 ]
Thober, Stephan [3 ]
Samaniego, Luis [3 ,4 ]
Rakovec, Oldrich [3 ,5 ]
Kelbling, Matthias [3 ]
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H. [6 ]
Wanders, Niko [6 ]
Blyth, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England
[2] Agencia Estatal Meteorol AEMET, Meteorol Surveillance & Forecasting Grp, DT Galicia, La Coruna, Spain
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Hydrosyst, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Praha Suchdol 16500, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Global hydrological forecasts; Hydrological models; ULYSSES; HydroSOS; Bias-correction; Multi-model blending; SOIL-MOISTURE; ENSEMBLE PREDICTION; MODEL DESCRIPTION; LAND EVAPORATION; PRECIPITATION; UNCERTAINTY; STREAMFLOW; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129607
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There is an immediate need to develop accurate and reliable global hydrological forecasts in light of the future vulnerability to hydrological hazards and water scarcity under a changing climate. As a part of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Hydrological Status and Outlook System (HydroSOS) initiative, we investigated different approaches to blending multi-model simulations for developing holistic operational global forecasts. The ULYSSES (mULti-model hYdrological SeaSonal prEdictionS system) dataset, to be published as "Global seasonal forecasts and reforecasts of river discharge and related hydrological variables ensemble from four state-of-the-art land surface and hydrological models"is used in this study. The first step for improving these forecasts is to investigate ways to improve the model simulations, as global models are not calibrated for local conditions. The analysis was performed over 119 different catchments worldwide for the baseline period of 1981-2019 for three variables: evapotranspiration, surface soil moisture and streamflow. This study evaluated blending approaches with a performance metric based (weighted) averaging of the multi-model simulations, using the catchment's Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) for the variable to define the weight. Hydrological model simulations were also bias-corrected to improve the multi-model blending output. Weighted blending in conjunction with bias-correction provided the best improvement in performance for the catchments investigated. Applying modelled weights during blending original simulations improved performance over ungauged catchments. The results indicate that there is potential to successfully and easily implement the bias-corrected weighted blending approach to improve operational forecasts globally. This work can be used to improve water resources management and hydrological hazard mitigation, especially in data-sparse regions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Blending multi-source data in hydrological simulations based on BMA method
    Yin J.
    Guo S.
    Wang J.
    Zhu Q.
    Zeng Q.
    Liu H.
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51 (11): : 1335 - 1346
  • [32] Multi-Model Evolution through Model Repair
    Stuenkel, Patrick
    Koenig, Harald
    Rutle, Adrian
    Lamo, Yngve
    JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 20 (01): : 1 - 25
  • [33] Impacts of bias nonstationarity of climate model outputs on hydrological simulations
    Hui, Yu
    Xu, Yuni
    Chen, Jie
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Chen, Hua
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (05): : 925 - 941
  • [34] Model-wise uncertainty decomposition in multi-model ensemble hydrological projections
    Ilsang Ohn
    Seonghyeon Kim
    Seung Beom Seo
    Young-Oh Kim
    Yongdai Kim
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35 : 2549 - 2565
  • [35] Model-wise uncertainty decomposition in multi-model ensemble hydrological projections
    Ohn, Ilsang
    Kim, Seonghyeon
    Seo, Seung Beom
    Kim, Young-Oh
    Kim, Yongdai
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (12) : 2549 - 2565
  • [36] Towards an Engineering Methodology for Multi-Model Scientific Simulations
    Margara, Alessandro
    Pezze, Mauro
    Pivkin, Igor V.
    Santoro, Mauro
    2015 IEEE/ACM 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING IN SCIENCE (SE4HPCS), 2015, : 51 - 55
  • [37] Ensemble Skill Gains Obtained From the Multi-Physics Versus Multi-Model Approaches for Continental-Scale Hydrological Simulations
    Fei, Wenli
    Zheng, Hui
    Xu, Zhongfeng
    Wu, Wen-Ying
    Lin, Peirong
    Tian, Ye
    Guo, Mengyao
    She, Dunxian
    Li, Lingcheng
    Li, Kai
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 57 (07)
  • [38] Multi-model seasonal prediction of global surface temperature based on partial regression correction method
    Yang, Yang
    Sun, Wenbin
    Zou, Meng
    Qiao, Shaobo
    Li, Qingxiang
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [39] Application of a comprehensive bias-correction model to precipitation measured at Russian North Pole drifting stations
    Bogdanova, EG
    Ilyin, BM
    Dragomilova, IV
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2002, 3 (06) : 700 - 713
  • [40] MULTI-MODEL ROBUST ERROR CORRECTION FOR FACE RECOGNITION
    Iliadis, Michael
    Spinoulas, Leonidas
    Berahas, Albert S.
    Wang, Haohong
    Katsaggelos, Aggelos K.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2016, : 3229 - 3233