Development of Hallux Valgus Classification Using Digital Foot Images with Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Hida, Mitsumasa [1 ,2 ]
Eto, Shinji [3 ]
Wada, Chikamune [3 ]
Kitagawa, Kodai [4 ]
Imaoka, Masakazu [1 ,2 ]
Nakamura, Misa [1 ,2 ]
Imai, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Kubo, Takanari [1 ]
Inoue, Takao [1 ]
Sakai, Keiko [1 ]
Orui, Junya [1 ,2 ]
Tazaki, Fumie [1 ]
Takeda, Masatoshi [1 ,2 ]
Hasegawa, Ayuna [5 ]
Yamasaka, Kota [5 ]
Nakao, Hidetoshi [6 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Kawasaki Rehabil Univ, Dept Rehabil, Mizuma 158, Kaizuka 5970104, Japan
[2] Osaka Kawasaki Rehabil Univ, Grad Sch Rehabil, Mizuma 158, Kaizuka 5970104, Japan
[3] Kyushu Inst Technol, Grad Sch Life Sci & Syst Engn, Hibikino 2-4,Wakamatsu ku, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Technol, Hachinohe Coll, Dept Ind Syst Engn, 16-1 Uwanotai, Hachinohe 0391192, Japan
[5] Takata Kamitani Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Kamiyamaguchi 4-26-14, Nishinomiya 6511421, Japan
[6] Josai Int Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, 1 Gumyo, Togane 2838555, Japan
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
hallux valgus; machine learning; image classification; VGG16; accuracy; preprocessing; AMERICAN-ORTHOPEDIC-FOOT; ANKLE-SOCIETY;
D O I
10.3390/life13051146
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Hallux valgus, a frequently seen foot deformity, requires early detection to prevent it from becoming more severe. It is a medical economic problem, so a means of quickly distinguishing it would be helpful. We designed and investigated the accuracy of an early version of a tool for screening hallux valgus using machine learning. The tool would ascertain whether patients had hallux valgus by analyzing pictures of their feet. In this study, 507 images of feet were used for machine learning. Image preprocessing was conducted using the comparatively simple pattern A (rescaling, angle adjustment, and trimming) and slightly more complicated pattern B (same, plus vertical flip, binary formatting, and edge emphasis). This study used the VGG16 convolutional neural network. Pattern B machine learning was more accurate than pattern A. In our early model, Pattern A achieved 0.62 for accuracy, 0.56 for precision, 0.94 for recall, and 0.71 for F1 score. As for Pattern B, the scores were 0.79, 0.77, 0.96, and 0.86, respectively. Machine learning was sufficiently accurate to distinguish foot images between feet with hallux valgus and normal feet. With further refinement, this tool could be used for the easy screening of hallux valgus.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Applications of Machine Learning in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diagnosis using Multimodal Images: A Review
    Mayya, Veena
    Tummala, Venkat
    Reddy, Chaduvula Upendra
    Mishra, Pranjal
    Boddu, Rajasekhar
    Olivia, Diana
    Kamath, S Sowmya
    IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2023, 53 (03)
  • [42] A deep learning method for foot-type classification using plantar pressure images
    Zhao, Yangyang
    Zhou, Jiali
    Qiu, Fei
    Liao, Xuying
    Jiang, Jianhua
    Chen, Heqing
    Lin, Xiaomei
    Hu, Yiqun
    He, Jianquan
    Chen, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [43] Validating the Foot and Ankle Outcome score for measuring foot dysfunction among hallux valgus surgery patients using item response theory
    Yusuf, Fardowsa
    Liu, Guiping
    Wing, Kevin
    Crump, Trafford
    Penner, Murray
    Younger, Alastair
    Veljkovic, Andrea
    Sutherland, Jason M.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (08) : 864 - 870
  • [44] Outcome after Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: A Study of Postoperative Foot Function Using Revised Foot Function Index Short Form
    Dux, Katherine
    Smith, Nicholas
    Rottier, Francis J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2013, 52 (04): : 422 - 425
  • [45] The Development of Major Tree Species Classification Model using Different Satellite Images and Machine Learning in Gwangneung Area
    Lim, Joongbin
    Kim, Kyoung-Min
    Kim, Myung-Kil
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 35 (06) : 1037 - 1052
  • [46] Zernike Moments and Machine Learning Based Gender Classification Using Facial Images
    Mahesh, Vijayalakshmi G. V.
    Raj, Alex Noel Joseph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (SOCPAR 2016), 2018, 614 : 398 - 408
  • [47] A Machine learning Classification approach for detection of Covid 19 using CT images
    Suguna, G. C.
    Veerabhadrappa, S. T.
    Tejas, A.
    Vaishnavi, P.
    Sudarshan, E.
    Gowda, Raghunandan, V
    Udupa, Panahami R.
    Spoorthy, R.
    Reddy, Smitha
    EMITTER-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10 (01) : 183 - 194
  • [48] Crack and Noncrack Classification from Concrete Surface Images Using Machine Learning
    Kim, Hyunjun
    Ahn, Eunjong
    Shin, Myoungsu
    Sim, Sung-Han
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (03): : 725 - 738
  • [49] Quality classification of Jatropha curcas seeds using radiographic images and machine learning
    de Medeiros, Andre Dantas
    Pinheiro, Daniel Teixeira
    Xavier, Wanderson Andrade
    da Silva, Laercio Junio
    Fernandes dos Santos Dias, Denise Cunha
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2020, 146
  • [50] Mineral Classification Using Machine Learning and Images of Microscopic Rock Thin Section
    Borges, Henrique Pereira
    de Aguiar, Marilton Sanchotene
    ADVANCES IN SOFT COMPUTING, MICAI 2019, 2019, 11835 : 63 - 76