Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT

被引:17
|
作者
Morgan, David L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sociol, POB 751, Portland, OR 97211 USA
关键词
qualitative data analysis; artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; coding;
D O I
10.1177/16094069231211248
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The potential use of artificial intelligence programs such as a ChatGPT to analyze qualitative data raises any number of questions, most notably whether it is possible to produce similar results without the demanding process of manual coding. In addition, there are questions about both the simplicity of using ChatGPT for qualitative data analysis and the potential time savings that it might provide This article addresses these questions by using ChatGPT to reinvestigate two qualitative datasets that were previously analyzed by more traditional methods. In particular, it examines the extent to which the responses from ChatGPT can recreate the themes that were originally chosen to summarize the two previous analyses. The results show that ChatGPT performed reasonably well, but in both cases it was less successful at locating subtle, interpretive themes, and more successful at reproducing concrete, descriptive themes. In doing so, the program was quite easy to use and required very little effort in comparison to approaches that rely on manual coding. It is important to recognize, however, that both coding and approaches based on artificial intelligence are simply tools that must be applied within a larger analytic process. Overall, this exploration suggests that artificial intelligence may well have the power to disrupt the coding of data segments as a dominant paradigm for qualitative data analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can ChatGPT explain it? Use of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis communication
    Hernan Inojosa
    Stephen Gilbert
    Jakob Nikolas Kather
    Undine Proschmann
    Katja Akgün
    Tjalf Ziemssen
    [J]. Neurological Research and Practice, 5
  • [32] Me and the Machines: Possibilities and Pitfalls of Using Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis
    Chubb, Laura Ann
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2023, 22
  • [33] May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?-The Case of ChatGPT
    Corsello, Antonio
    Santangelo, Andrea
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (04):
  • [34] Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT and primary care
    Eguia, Hans
    Garcia, Javier Francisco Sanz
    [J]. MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2023, 49 (07):
  • [35] Analyzing behavioral intentions toward Generative Artificial Intelligence: the case of ChatGPT
    Nan, Dongyan
    Sun, Seungjong
    Zhang, Shunan
    Zhao, Xiangying
    Kim, Jang Hyun
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [36] ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Lucchi, Nicola
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2023,
  • [37] Artificial intelligence in education: the challenges of ChatGPT
    Rodrigues, Olira Saraiva
    Rodrigues, Karoline Santos
    [J]. TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA, 2023, 16
  • [38] Artificial intelligence ChatGPT failed in pharma
    Haroche, Frederic
    [J]. ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES, 2024, 63 (632):
  • [39] ChatGPT-Artificial Intelligence and Physiatry
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2024, 103 (04) : e49 - e49
  • [40] Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: ChatGPT and Beyond
    Hulsen, Tim
    [J]. AI, 2024, 5 (02) : 550 - 554