Subjective and objective survival prediction in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Boeck, Lucas [1 ,2 ]
Pargger, Hans [3 ]
Schellongowski, Peter [4 ]
Luyt, Charles-Edouard [5 ,6 ]
Maggiorini, Marco [7 ]
Jahn, Kathleen [1 ]
Muller, Gregoire [5 ]
Loetscher, Rene [8 ]
Bucher, Evelyne [3 ]
Cueni, Nadine [3 ]
Staudinger, Thomas [4 ]
Chastre, Jean [5 ]
Siegemund, Martin [1 ,3 ]
Tamm, Michael [1 ]
Stolz, Daiana [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Clin Res, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Biomed, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Acute Med, Intens Care Unit, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Vienna, Dept Internal Med 1, Vienna, Austria
[5] Sorbonne Univ, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Inst Cardiol, Med Intens Reanimat,Grp Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
[6] Sorbonne Univ, ICAN Inst Cardiometab & Nutr, UMRS 1166, INSERM, Paris, France
[7] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Internal Med, Intens Care Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] Kantonsspital Baselland, Surg & Med Intens Care Med, Liestal, Switzerland
[9] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Med Ctr, Dept Pneumol, Freiburg, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Risk stratification; Personalised medicine; Critical care; Scores; Outcome; Modelling; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; ICU; FAILURE; DISEASE; SCORE; CLASSIFICATION; PHYSICIANS; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-023-04381-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background ICU risk assessment tools, routinely used for predicting population outcomes, are not recommended for evaluating individual risk. The state of health of single patients is mostly subjectively assessed to inform relatives and presumably to decide on treatment decisions. However, little is known how subjective and objective survival estimates compare. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients across five European centres, assessed 62 objective markers and asked the clinical staff to subjectively estimate the probability of surviving 28 days. Results Within the 961 included patients, we identified 27 single objective predictors for 28-day survival (73.8%) and pooled them into predictive groups. While patient characteristics and treatment models performed poorly, the disease and biomarker models had a moderate discriminative performance for predicting 28- day survival, which improved for predicting 1-year survival. Subjective estimates of nurses (c-statistic [95% CI] 0.74 [0.70-0.78]), junior physicians (0.78 [0.74-0.81]) and attending physicians (0.75 [0.72-0.79]) discriminated survivors from non-survivors at least as good as the combination of all objective predictors (c-statistic: 0.67-0.72). Unexpectedly, subjective estimates were insufficiently calibrated, overestimating death in high-risk patients by about 20% in absolute terms. Combining subjective and objective measures refined discrimination and reduced the overestimation of death. Conclusions Subjective survival estimates are simple, cheap and similarly discriminative as objective models; however, they overestimate death risking that live-saving therapies are withheld. Therefore, subjective survival estimates of individual patients should be compared with objective tools and interpreted with caution if not agreeing. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN59376582, retrospectively registered October 31st 2013.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Compare the effect of noninvasive ventilation and tracheotomy in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients: a retrospective observe cohort study
    Dong, Meiling
    Zhou, Yongfang
    Yang, Jing
    Yang, Jie
    Liao, Xuelian
    Kang, Yan
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [42] Compare the effect of noninvasive ventilation and tracheotomy in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients: a retrospective observe cohort study
    Meiling Dong
    Yongfang Zhou
    Jing Yang
    Jie Yang
    Xuelian Liao
    Yan Kang
    BMC Neurology, 19
  • [43] Effects of propofol on sleep quality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a physiological study
    Eumorfia Kondili
    Christina Alexopoulou
    Nectaria Xirouchaki
    Dimitris Georgopoulos
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2012, 38 : 1640 - 1646
  • [44] Effects of propofol on sleep quality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a physiological study
    Kondili, Eumorfia
    Alexopoulou, Christina
    Xirouchaki, Nectaria
    Georgopoulos, Dimitris
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (10) : 1640 - 1646
  • [45] DYSPNEA PREVALENCE IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CRITICAL-ILL PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Schmidt, M.
    Demoule, A.
    Polito, A.
    Porchet, R.
    Siami, S.
    Aboab, J.
    Similowski, T.
    Sharshar, T.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 22 - 22
  • [46] Oxygen management in mechanically ventilated patients: A prospective observational cohort study
    Suzuki, S.
    Eastwood, G.
    Peck, L.
    Glassford, N.
    Bellomo, R.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 27 (01) : 50 - 51
  • [47] Nonsedation or Light Sedation in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients Reply
    Olsen, Hanne T.
    Nedergaard, Helene K.
    Toft, Palle
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (26):
  • [48] Spontaneous variability of arterial oxygenation in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients
    Tsai, YH
    Lin, MC
    Hsieh, HJ
    Chen, NH
    Tsao, TCY
    Lee, CH
    Huang, CC
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 25 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [49] A SENSIBLE APPROACH TO THE NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT OF MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    CHRISTMAN, JW
    MCCAIN, RW
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 19 (03) : 129 - 136
  • [50] Sensory interventions to relieve dyspnoea in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients
    Bureau, Come
    Nierat, Marie-Cecile
    Decavele, Maxens
    Rivals, Isabelle
    Dangers, Laurence
    Beurton, Alexandra
    le, Sara Virol
    Deleris, Robin
    Delemazure, Julie
    Mayaux, Julien
    Morelot-Panzini, Capucine
    Dres, Martin
    Similowski, Thomas
    Demoule, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2024, 63 (01)