Substrate affinities of wood decay fungi are foremost structured by wood properties not climate

被引:3
|
作者
Rustoen, Fredrik [1 ]
Hoiland, Klaus [1 ]
Heegaard, Einar [2 ]
Boddy, Lynne [3 ]
Gange, Alan C. [4 ]
Kauserud, Havard [1 ]
Andrew, Carrie [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Sect Genet & Evolutionary Biol EVOGENE, Blindernveien 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res, Forestry & Forest Resources, Fanaflaten 4, N-5244 Fana, Norway
[3] Cardiff Univ, Sch Biosci, Museum Ave, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
[4] Univ London, Dept Biol Sci Royal Holloway, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[5] Oberlin Coll & Conservatory, Biol Dept, 119 Woodland St, Oberlin, OH 44074 USA
关键词
Affinity; Climate; Decay; Reproductive traits; Specialization; Substrate usage; Wood; SPECIES RICHNESS; HOST SHIFTS; PATTERNS; BIODIVERSITY; 4TH-CORNER; RESPONSES; DEADWOOD; REVEALS; TRAITS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101231
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Wood decomposing fungi differ in their substrate affinities, but to what extent factors like wood properties influence host specialization, compared to climate, is largely unknown. In this study, we analysed British field observations of 61 common wood decay species associated with 41 tree and shrub genera. While white rot fungi ranged from low-to high-substrate affinity, brown rot fungi were exclusively mid-to high-affinity. White rot fungi associated with dead fallen wood demonstrated the least substrate affinity. The composition of wood decomposer fungi was mostly structured by substrate properties, sorted between angiosperms and conifers. Any relationships with temporal and regional climate variability were of far less significance, but did predict community-based and substrate-usage host shifts, especially for fungi on fallen deadwood. Our results demonstrate that substrate shifts by wood-decay fungi will depend primarily upon their degree of affinity to, and the distribution of, related woody genera, followed less at regional levels by climate impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Isozyme analysis on some wood decay fungi
    Annesi, T
    Coppola, R
    Motta, E
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) : 87 - 90
  • [22] Wood decay fungi: an analysis of worldwide research
    Li, Tong
    Cui, Lizhen
    Song, Xiufang
    Cui, Xiaoyong
    Wei, Yulian
    Tang, Li
    Mu, Yanhong
    Xu, Zhihong
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2022, 22 (06) : 1688 - 1702
  • [23] WOOD DECAY FUNGI OF COSTA-RICA
    CARRANZA, J
    SAENZ, JA
    MYCOTAXON, 1984, 19 (JAN-) : 151 - 166
  • [24] Studies in wood decay VI - The effect of arsenic, zinc, and copper on the rate of decay of wood by certain wood-destroying fungi
    Kaufert, F
    Schmitz, H
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1937, 27 (07) : 780 - 788
  • [25] A WOOD SOIL CONTACT CULTURE TECHNIQUE FOR LABORATORY STUDY OF WOOD-DESTROYING FUNGI, WOOD DECAY AND WOOD PRESERVATION
    LEUTRITZ, J
    BELL SYSTEM TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1946, 25 (01): : 102 - 135
  • [26] THE EFFECT OF ALPHA-AMINOISOBUTYRIC-ACID ON WOOD DECAY AND WOOD SPOILAGE FUNGI
    ELLIOTT, ML
    WATKINSON, SC
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION, 1989, 25 (05): : 355 - 371
  • [27] INFLUENCE OF LIQUEFIED AND CCB CONTAINING LIQUEFIED WOOD ON GROWTH OF WOOD DECAY FUNGI
    Hrastnik, D.
    Budija, F.
    Humar, M.
    Petric, M.
    MADERAS-CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA, 2013, 15 (01): : 105 - 118
  • [28] ACTION OF MICROFUNGI ON WOOD .6. NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS OF FUNGI FOR WOOD DECAY
    FUKUDA, K
    MIZUTANI, S
    HARAGUCHI, T
    MOKUZAI GAKKAISHI, 1985, 31 (04): : 294 - 300
  • [29] Gene Expression Patterns of Wood Decay Fungi Postia placenta and Phanerochaete chrysosporium Are Influenced by Wood Substrate Composition during Degradation
    Skyba, Oleksandr
    Cullen, Dan
    Douglas, Carl J.
    Mansfield, Shawn D.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 82 (14) : 4387 - 4400
  • [30] Resistance of bioincised wood treated with wood preservatives to blue-stain and wood-decay fungi
    Schubert, M.
    Volkmer, T.
    Lehringer, C.
    Schwarze, F. W. M. R.
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2011, 65 (01) : 108 - 115