Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the pandemic fatigue scale (PFS) in five South American countries

被引:1
|
作者
Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas [1 ]
Torales, Julio [2 ,3 ]
Vilca, Lindsey W. [4 ]
Barrios, Ivan [5 ]
Waisman-Campos, Marcela [6 ,7 ]
Terrazas-Landivar, Alexandra [8 ]
Viola, Laura [9 ]
O'Higgins, Marcelo [3 ]
Amarilla, Diego [2 ]
Almiron-Santacruz, Jose [2 ]
Castaldelli-Maia, Joao Mauricio [10 ,11 ]
Ventriglio, Antonio [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cient Sur, Fac Psicol, Lima, Peru
[2] Natl Univ Asunc, Sch Med Sci, Dept Med Psychol, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
[3] Natl Univ Asunc, Sch Med Sci, Dept Psychiat, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
[4] Univ Norbert Wiener, South Amer Ctr Educ & Res Publ Hlth, Lima, Peru
[5] Natl Univ Asunc, Sch Med Sci, Dept Stat, Santa Rosa Aguaray Campus, Santa Rosa Del Aguaray, Paraguay
[6] Fleni, Dept Neuropsychiat, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[7] Univ Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[8] Univ Domingo, Mental Hlth Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
[9] Asociac Espanola, Dept Child Psychiat, Montevideo, Uruguay
[10] Fundacao ABC, Dept Neurosci, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
[11] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Psychiat, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[12] Univ Foggia, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Foggia, Italy
关键词
Fatigue; Pandemic; Covid-19; Invariance; South America; OF-FIT INDEXES; PACKAGE; IMPACT; ALPHA; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-023-05004-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) in five South American countries, Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. A total of 1448 people selected through convenience sampling (295 Argentines, 294 Bolivians, 279 Uruguayans, 277 Peruvians, and 303 Paraguayans) participated. The two-dimensional structure of the PFS fitted well with the data from each country. Invariance analysis showed that PFS was completely invariant across countries, thus providing a solid basis for comparisons between groups. Adequate discrimination and difficulty were reported for all items. Adequate discrimination parameters would indicate that the PFS items would allow people to differentiate the choice of response alternatives based on the presence of PF. In addition, the difficulty parameters indicate that people require a greater presence of the latent trait to respond to the higher response alternatives of PFS. It was also observed that the boredom and neglect dimensions have a significant and negative impact on protective behaviors, providing evidence of validity based on their relationship with other constructs. In conclusion, the PFS presents evidence of validity and MI for the measurement of PF in the five South American countries included in this study. Thus, PFS can contribute to future empirical research that compares FP in different South American populations and cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:18836 / 18850
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cross-cultural validation of the positivity-scale in five European countries
    Heikamp, Tobias
    Alessandri, Guido
    Laguna, Mariola
    Petrovic, Vesna
    Caprara, Maria Giovanna
    Trommsdorff, Gisela
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 71 : 140 - 145
  • [12] Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the fear of COVID-19 scale in three Portuguese-speaking countries
    Giolo, Suely Ruiz
    Formighieri Giordani, Rubia Carla
    da Silva, Milene Zanoni
    Azevedo Dias, Paulo Cesar
    Estavela, Arune
    Mabuie, Janete Ismael
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 27 (13) : 2997 - 3012
  • [13] Cross-Cultural Commonalities in Religiosity by Measurement Invariance
    Watanabe, Mitsuharu
    Kawabata, Akira
    Yumiyama, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2022, 61 (3-4) : 690 - 709
  • [14] Personal Wellbeing Index: A Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Study Across Four Countries
    Veljko Jovanović
    Robert A. Cummins
    Melissa Weinberg
    Ljiljana Kaliterna
    Zvjezdana Prizmic-Larsen
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, 20 : 759 - 775
  • [15] Personal Wellbeing Index: A Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Study Across Four Countries
    Jovanovic, Veljko
    Cummins, Robert A.
    Weinberg, Melissa
    Kaliterna, Ljiljana
    Prizmic-Larsen, Zvjezdana
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2019, 20 (03) : 759 - 775
  • [16] Cross-cultural measurement invariance of divergent thinking measures
    Guo, Yawei
    Lin, Shengjie
    Guo, Jiajun
    Lu, Zhenqiu
    Shangguan, Chenyu
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 41
  • [17] Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the climate change hope scale in Filipino and Indian youth
    Simon, Patricia D.
    Pandey, Shubham
    Chandra, Saumya
    Srivastava, Akanksha
    Jaiswal, Aishwarya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 59 : 295 - 295
  • [18] Measurement Invariance of the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale: A Cross-Cultural Study
    Li, Shengnan
    Heath, Patrick J.
    Vidales, Carlos A.
    Vogel, David L.
    Nie, Yangang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [19] Network analysis of pandemic fatigue symptoms in samples from five South American countries
    Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas
    Torales, Julio
    Ventura-Leon, Jose
    Barrios, Ivan
    Waisman-Campos, Marcela
    Terrazas-Landivar, Alexandra
    Viola, Laura
    Vilca, Lindsey W.
    Munoz-del-Carpio-Toia, Agueda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 70 (03) : 601 - 614
  • [20] Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the purpose in life test - Short form (PIL-SF) in seven Latin American countries
    Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez
    Lindsey W. Vilca
    Mauricio Cervigni
    Miguel Gallegos
    Pablo Martino
    Manuel Calandra
    Cesar Armando Rey Anacona
    Claudio López-Calle
    Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera
    Edgardo René Chacón-Andrade
    Marlon Elías Lobos-Rivera
    Perla del Carpio
    Yazmín Quintero
    Erika Robles
    Macerlo Panza Lombardo
    Olivia Gamarra Recalde
    Andrés Buschiazzo Figares
    Michael White
    Carmen Burgos Videla
    Carlos Carbajal-León
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 23772 - 23787