Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19

被引:1
|
作者
Ogane, Kana [1 ]
Imai, Kazuo [1 ,3 ]
Orihara, Yuta [1 ]
Kodana, Masahiro [1 ]
Tezuka, Mariko [1 ]
Matsuzaki, Nanako [1 ]
Takahashi, Rina [1 ]
Ichimura, Shintaro [1 ]
Tokano, Mieko [2 ]
Sakai, Jun [2 ]
Tarumoto, Norihito [2 ]
Maesaki, Shigefumi [2 ]
Takuya, Maeda [1 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Saitama, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Infect Dis & Infect Control, Saitama, Japan
[3] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Clin Lab, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama 3500495, Japan
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Anterior nasal swab; RT-qPCR; Rapid antigen test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%-86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%- 99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%-91.5%), with a & kappa; coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (& LE;3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (& GE;4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 828
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Clinical application of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device and SSf-COVID19 kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Sang-Min Oh
    Jee-Soo Lee
    Hyeon Jae Jo
    Donghwan Kim
    Dohyeon Park
    Young Hoon Hwang
    Yunsang Choi
    Chan Mi Lee
    Seungjae Lee
    Euijin Chang
    Eunyoung Lee
    Taek Soo Kim
    Moon-Woo Seong
    Pyoeng Gyun Choe
    Nam Joong Kim
    BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [12] Clinical application of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device and SSf-COVID19 kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Oh, Sang-Min
    Lee, Jee-Soo
    Jo, Hyeon Jae
    Kim, Donghwan
    Park, Dohyeon
    Hwang, Young Hoon
    Choi, Yunsang
    Lee, Chan Mi
    Lee, Seungjae
    Chang, Euijin
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Seong, Moon-Woo
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Kim, Nam Joong
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [13] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasal Cavity and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 Detection via Rapid Antigen Test According to Specimen Collection Timing and Viral Load
    Lee, Seungjun
    Widyasari, Kristin
    Yang, Hye-Ryun
    Jang, Jieun
    Kang, Taejoon
    Kim, Sunjoo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [14] Clinical Evaluation of a New Antigen-Based COVID-19 Rapid Diagnostic Test from Symptomatic Patients
    Sazed, Saiful Arefeen
    Kibria, Mohammad Golam
    Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
    Zamil, Md Fahad
    Adhikary, Pranob Chandra
    Hossain, Mohammad Enayet
    Ahmed, Dilruba
    Haque, Rashidul
    Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [15] A prospective clinical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test using anterior nasal samples*
    Akashi, Yusaku
    Horie, Michiko
    Takeuchi, Yuto
    Togashi, Kenichi
    Adachi, Yuki
    Ueda, Atsuo
    Notake, Shigeyuki
    Nakamura, Koji
    Terada, Norihiko
    Kurihara, Yoko
    Kiyasu, Yoshihiko
    Suzuki, Hiromichi
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 28 (06) : 780 - 785
  • [16] Evaluation of the Abbott PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag rapid antigen test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic Canadians
    Shaw, Julie L., V
    Deslandes, Vincent
    Smith, Jennifer
    Desjardins, Marc
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (04)
  • [17] Evaluation of the rapid antigen test Panbio COVID-19 in saliva and nasal swabs in a population-based point-of-care study
    Agullo, Vanesa
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Marta
    Ortiz de la Tabla, Victoria
    Gonzalo-Jimenez, Nieves
    Garcia, Jose A.
    Masia, Mar
    Gutierrez, Felix
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (05) : 194 - 197
  • [18] Performance evaluation of antigen detection rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 diagnosis in a primary healthcare center during the Shanghai COVID-19 quarantine period
    Dong, Lan
    Li, Wen-Fang
    Jiang, Ying
    VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [19] Performance evaluation of antigen detection rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 diagnosis in a primary healthcare center during the Shanghai COVID-19 quarantine period
    Lan Dong
    Wen-Fang Li
    Ying Jiang
    Virology Journal, 19
  • [20] Clinical Evaluation of the Rapid STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Screening of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
    Kim, Hyung Woo
    Park, Mikyoung
    Lee, Jong Ho
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 42 (01) : 100 - 104