Synthetic Attributes and the Schematized Categories

Within Kant scholarship, there is an entrenched tendency to distinguish, on Kant's behalf, between pure and 'schematized' categories. There is also a widespread tendency to view the schematized categories as conceptually richer than the pure categories. I argue that this reading of the distinction, which I call the standard view, should be rejected. In its place, I draw on a neglected part of Kant's theory of marks - namely, his account of 'synthetic attributes' - to propose an account of the distinction that preserves a strict identity between pure and schematized categories at the level of analysable content.