Improved Framework for Classification of Flight Phases of General Aviation Aircraft

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Qilei [1 ]
Mott, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Aviat & Transportat Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
aviation; advanced analytics and data science; machine learning; emissions; air quality; data and data science; data analytics; pattern recognition;
D O I
10.1177/03611981221127016
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Flight data mining enables airport owners, operators, and governmental entities to explore more intelligent management strategies; in particular, cost-effectively obtaining accurate operational data is beneficial for general aviation (GA) airports and their associated communities. The current data collection modus operandi, however, does not meet future needs, as aircraft operations are counted manually or estimated by sampling methods. The increasing traffic flow and limited available personnel at most GA airports make it unrealistic to continue using traditional methods to analyze aircraft operational statistics; therefore, a customized approach is needed to address this problem. Since different flight phases have different levels and types of impact on the environment, acquiring information related to the duration of each flight phase at the airport and within its surrounding airspace is critical to the assessment of emissions and noise pollution from aircraft. The primary goal of the research is to provide quantified inputs for the environmental evaluation model, such as the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT). This paper demonstrates a programmed framework that successfully achieves satisfactory performance in solving flight phase identification problems by testing the synthetic flight data as well as validating the empirical Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data. The experimental results suggest that the proposed methods achieve promising classification accuracy, leading to feasible deployment in airport operations.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1675
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The case for flight simulation in general aviation
    Allerton, DJ
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 106 (1065): : 607 - 612
  • [23] Inner Loop Command Interface in a Modular Flight Control Architecture for Trajectory Flights of General Aviation Aircraft
    Schatz, Simon P.
    Gabrys, Agnes C.
    Gierszewski, Daniel M.
    Holzapfel, Florian
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2018, : 86 - 91
  • [24] EVALUATION OF GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLYING QUALITIES
    BARBER, MR
    HAISE, FW
    JONES, CK
    SAE TRANSACTIONS, 1967, 75 : 93 - &
  • [25] Record billings in '98 for general aviation aircraft
    Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), 1999, 150 (07):
  • [26] SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF GENERAL AVIATION AND STOL AIRCRAFT
    OLLERHEA.JB
    ADCOCK, BD
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1970, 48 (01): : 124 - +
  • [27] STALLING CHARACTERISTICS OF A GENERAL-AVIATION AIRCRAFT
    STENGEL, RF
    NIXON, WB
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1982, 19 (06): : 425 - 434
  • [28] Automatic Takeoff of a General Aviation Research Aircraft
    Zollitsch, Alexander W.
    Mumm, Nils C.
    Wulf, Simona
    Holzapfel, Florian
    Hochstrasser, Markus
    Lauffs, Patrick J.
    Peter, Lars
    2017 11TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2017, : 1683 - 1688
  • [29] Design Analysis and Modeling of a General Aviation Aircraft
    Darwish, F. H.
    Atmeh, G. M.
    Hasan, Z. F.
    JORDAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 6 (02): : 183 - 191
  • [30] Prediction of the development cost of general aviation aircraft
    Chen, Xiaonan
    Huang, Jun
    Yi, Mingxu
    Pan, Yalin
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 91 (04): : 567 - 574