Quality of information and appropriateness of Open AI outputs for prostate cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Lombardo, Riccardo [1 ]
Gallo, Giacomo [1 ]
Stira, Jordi [1 ]
Turchi, Beatrice [1 ]
Santoro, Giuseppe [1 ]
Riolo, Sara [1 ]
Romagnoli, Matteo [1 ]
Cicione, Antonio [1 ]
Tema, Giorgia [1 ]
Pastore, Antonio [1 ]
Al Salhi, Yazan [1 ]
Fuschi, Andrea [1 ]
Franco, Giorgio [1 ]
Nacchia, Antonio [1 ]
Tubaro, Andrea [1 ]
De Nunzio, Cosimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41391-024-00789-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Chat-GPT, a natural language processing (NLP) tool created by Open-AI, can potentially be used as a quick source for obtaining information related to prostate cancer. This study aims to analyze the quality and appropriateness of Chat-GPT's responses to inquiries related to prostate cancer compared to those of the European Urology Association's (EAU) 2023 prostate cancer guidelines. Overall, 195 questions were prepared according to the recommendations gathered in the prostate cancer section of the EAU 2023 Guideline. All questions were systematically presented to Chat-GPT's August 3 Version, and two expert urologists independently assessed and assigned scores ranging from 1 to 4 to each response (1: completely correct, 2: correct but inadequate, 3: a mix of correct and misleading information, and 4: completely incorrect). Sub-analysis per chapter and per grade of recommendation were performed. Overall, 195 recommendations were evaluated. Overall, 50/195 (26%) were completely correct, 51/195 (26%) correct but inadequate, 47/195 (24%) a mix of correct and misleading and 47/195 (24%) incorrect. When looking at different chapters Open AI was particularly accurate in answering questions on follow-up and QoL. Worst performance was recorded for the diagnosis and treatment chapters with respectively 19% and 30% of the answers completely incorrect. When looking at the strength of recommendation, no differences in terms of accuracy were recorded when comparing weak and strong recommendations (p > 0,05). Chat-GPT has a poor accuracy when answering questions on the PCa EAU guidelines recommendations. Future studies should assess its performance after adequate training.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 231
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social determinants of health into evaluations of quality and appropriateness of AI assistant ChatGPT
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (01) : 158 - 158
  • [22] Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: An assessment of quality
    Ilic, D
    Risbridger, G
    Green, S
    UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (01) : 112 - 116
  • [23] MEDICARE ACO ENROLLMENT AND APPROPRIATENESS OF PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING
    Resnick, Matthew
    Gambrel, Robert
    Graves, Amy
    Tyson, Mark
    Lee, Daniel
    Buntin, Melinda
    Penson, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E409 - E409
  • [24] Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Hara, I
    Kawabata, G
    Tanaka, K
    Nakamura, I
    Hara, S
    Kamidono, S
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 38 - 39
  • [25] Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Hara, I
    Kawabata, G
    Miyake, H
    Nakamura, I
    Hara, S
    Okada, H
    Kamidono, S
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06): : 2045 - 2048
  • [26] PROSTATE CANCER INFORMATION
    Yousefi, R.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 57 (01) : 165 - 165
  • [27] TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires
    Xu, Alex J.
    Taylor, Jacob
    Gao, Tian
    Mihalcea, Rada
    Perez-Rosas, Veronica
    Loeb, Stacy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (04) : 435 - 437
  • [28] Evaluating the Quality of Online Health Information about Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Lee, Jason G.
    Reissmann, Molly E.
    Parkhomenko, Egor
    Wang, David S.
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (03) : 360 - 365
  • [29] Information satisfaction in breast and prostate cancer patients: implications for quality of life
    Davies, Nicola J.
    Kinman, Gail
    Thomas, Robert J.
    Bailey, Tracey
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 (10) : 1048 - 1052
  • [30] QUALITY OF INFORMATION IN SPANISH ON BRCA AND GENETIC TESTING IN PROSTATE CANCER ON YOUTUBE
    Friedman, Brett
    Hills, Auburn
    Pineault, Kevin
    Nolasco, Tatiana Sanchez
    Borno, Hala
    Giri, Veda
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E142 - E143