Quality of information and appropriateness of Open AI outputs for prostate cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Lombardo, Riccardo [1 ]
Gallo, Giacomo [1 ]
Stira, Jordi [1 ]
Turchi, Beatrice [1 ]
Santoro, Giuseppe [1 ]
Riolo, Sara [1 ]
Romagnoli, Matteo [1 ]
Cicione, Antonio [1 ]
Tema, Giorgia [1 ]
Pastore, Antonio [1 ]
Al Salhi, Yazan [1 ]
Fuschi, Andrea [1 ]
Franco, Giorgio [1 ]
Nacchia, Antonio [1 ]
Tubaro, Andrea [1 ]
De Nunzio, Cosimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41391-024-00789-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Chat-GPT, a natural language processing (NLP) tool created by Open-AI, can potentially be used as a quick source for obtaining information related to prostate cancer. This study aims to analyze the quality and appropriateness of Chat-GPT's responses to inquiries related to prostate cancer compared to those of the European Urology Association's (EAU) 2023 prostate cancer guidelines. Overall, 195 questions were prepared according to the recommendations gathered in the prostate cancer section of the EAU 2023 Guideline. All questions were systematically presented to Chat-GPT's August 3 Version, and two expert urologists independently assessed and assigned scores ranging from 1 to 4 to each response (1: completely correct, 2: correct but inadequate, 3: a mix of correct and misleading information, and 4: completely incorrect). Sub-analysis per chapter and per grade of recommendation were performed. Overall, 195 recommendations were evaluated. Overall, 50/195 (26%) were completely correct, 51/195 (26%) correct but inadequate, 47/195 (24%) a mix of correct and misleading and 47/195 (24%) incorrect. When looking at different chapters Open AI was particularly accurate in answering questions on follow-up and QoL. Worst performance was recorded for the diagnosis and treatment chapters with respectively 19% and 30% of the answers completely incorrect. When looking at the strength of recommendation, no differences in terms of accuracy were recorded when comparing weak and strong recommendations (p > 0,05). Chat-GPT has a poor accuracy when answering questions on the PCa EAU guidelines recommendations. Future studies should assess its performance after adequate training.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 231
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of information and appropriateness of Open AI outputs for lithiasis management
    Guercio, A.
    Sarcinelli, L.
    Romagoli, M.
    Riolo, S.
    Nacchia, A.
    Lombardo, R.
    Tema, G.
    Guarnotta, G.
    Cicione, A.
    Pastore, A.
    Al Salhi, Y.
    Franco, G.
    Sciarra, A.
    Tubaro, A.
    Carbone, A.
    De Nunzio, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S785 - S786
  • [2] Quality of information and appropriateness of Open AI outputs for urinary tract infections
    Romagnoli, M.
    Riolo, S.
    Santoro, G.
    Lombardo, R.
    Tema, G.
    Nacchia, A.
    Guarnotta, G.
    Cicione, A.
    Pastore, A.
    Al Salhi, Y.
    Carbone, A.
    Franco, G.
    Sciarra, A.
    Tubaro, A.
    De Nunzio, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S143 - S143
  • [3] Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urological trauma
    Gallo, G.
    Mancini, E.
    Lombardo, R.
    Turchi, B.
    Fiasconaro, D.
    Stira, J.
    Gravina, C.
    Tema, G.
    Nacchia, A.
    Guarnotta, G.
    Cicione, A.
    Pastore, A.
    Al Salhi, Y.
    Carbone, A.
    Franco, G.
    Sciarra, A.
    Tubaro, A.
    Romagnoli, M.
    Santoro, G.
    De Nunzio, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1891 - S1891
  • [4] Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients
    Cocci, Andrea
    Pezzoli, Marta
    Lo Re, Mattia
    Russo, Giorgio Ivan
    Asmundo, Maria Giovanna
    Fode, Mikkel
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    Cimino, Sebastiano
    Minervini, Andrea
    Durukan, Emil
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [5] Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients
    Andrea Cocci
    Marta Pezzoli
    Mattia Lo Re
    Giorgio Ivan Russo
    Maria Giovanna Asmundo
    Mikkel Fode
    Giovanni Cacciamani
    Sebastiano Cimino
    Andrea Minervini
    Emil Durukan
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2024, 27 : 159 - 160
  • [6] Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients
    Andrea Cocci
    Marta Pezzoli
    Mattia Lo Re
    Giorgio Ivan Russo
    Maria Giovanna Asmundo
    Mikkel Fode
    Giovanni Cacciamani
    Sebastiano Cimino
    Andrea Minervini
    Emil Durukan
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2024, 27 : 103 - 108
  • [7] Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for neuro-urology
    Geretto, Paolo
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Albisinni, Simone
    Turchi, Beatrice
    Campi, Riccardo
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Pelizzari, Laura
    Gallo, Maria L.
    Sampogna, Gianluca
    Giammo, Alessandro
    Li Marzi, Vincenzo
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 76 (02): : 138 - 140
  • [8] Dr Bot - Does AI Provide Quality Information to Prostate Cancer Patients?
    Collin, Harry
    Keogh, Kandice
    Roberts, Matthew
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 : 66 - 66
  • [9] Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality
    Nikhil Kapila
    Harjinder Singh
    Kiranmayee Kandragunta
    Fernando J. Castro
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2019, 64 : 2798 - 2805
  • [10] Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality
    Kapila, Nikhil
    Singh, Harjinder
    Kandragunta, Kiranmayee
    Castro, Fernando J.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (10) : 2798 - 2805