Uncertainty in primary and secondary topographic attributes caused by digital elevation model spatial resolution

被引:6
|
作者
Salekin, Serajis [1 ]
Lad, Priscilla [1 ]
Morgenroth, Justin [2 ]
Dickinson, Yvette [1 ]
Meason, Dean F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scion, New Zealand Forest Res Inst Ltd, 49 Sala St, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand
[2] Univ Canterbury, New Zealand Sch Forestry, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
关键词
Digital elevation model; Spatial resolution; Topographic attributes; Spatial modelling; Landscape modelling; Terrain analysis; DEM RESOLUTION; HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS; EFFECT SIZE; SLOPE; ACCURACY; INTERPOLATION; VARIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; SWAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107320
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Digital elevation models (DEMs) are increasingly being used to explain different soil and site-related characteristics using a variety of modelled topographic properties and their frequencies. It is well known that the grid cell size of a raster DEM significantly affects derived primary and secondary topographic attirbutes, such as elevation, slope, topographic position index, and wind exposition index. This study investigates the impact of increasing DEM spatial resolution on spatial distortion (defined by mean absolute error (MAE)) in two contrasting sites and tests two different data-obtaining procedures (average plot vs. single point). Findings detected and quantified significant error(s) caused by coarsening DEM spatial resolution. In addition, the plot average measurement procedure was more representative for any bounded area than a value extracted from a single point measurement. These findings provide important guidance for creating and using topographic attributes across a range of applications. This study recommends using DEM resolution of <15 m to derive primary and secondary topographic attributes. However, the optimal resolution is scale dependent and related with landscape; henceforth, coarser resolution may be sufficient for representing large-scale topographic features.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modification of a digital elevation model (DEM) in a flat topographic area with respect to manmade features
    Kanoua, Wael
    Merkel, Broder J.
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [42] The Effects of Spatial Resolution Variability of Digital Elevation Models on Flood Hazard Analysis
    Ozdemir, Hasan
    Akbas, Abdullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY-COGRAFYA DERGISI, 2023, (46): : 137 - 156
  • [43] Effects of topographic data resolution and spatial model resolution on a bi-dimensional hydro-morphological model
    Frank, E.
    Montoya, M.
    Fattorelli, S.
    [J]. RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT IV, 2007, 104 : 325 - 334
  • [44] The effects of digital elevation model resolution on the PyFLOWGO thermorheological lava flow model
    Flynn, Ian T. W.
    Chevrel, Magdalena O.
    Crown, David A.
    Ramsey, Michael S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2023, 167
  • [45] Impacts of coarse-resolution soil maps and high-resolution digital-elevation-model-generated attributes on modelling forest soil zinc and copper
    Zhao, Zhengyong
    Yang, Qi
    Ding, Xiaogang
    Xing, Zisheng
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 101 (02) : 261 - 276
  • [46] Assessing digital elevation model resolution for soil organic carbon prediction
    Gibson, A. J.
    Hancock, G. R.
    Bretreger, D.
    Cox, T.
    Hughes, J.
    Kunkel, V
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2021, 398
  • [48] A continuous digital elevation representation model for DEM super-resolution
    Yao, Shun
    Cheng, Yongmei
    Yang, Fei
    Mozerov, Mikhail G.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 208 : 1 - 13
  • [49] Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions
    McMaster, KJ
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (04)
  • [50] Sensitivity of snow avalanche simulations to digital elevation model quality and resolution
    Buehler, Yves
    Christen, Marc
    Kowalski, Julia
    Bartelt, Perry
    [J]. ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, 2011, 52 (58) : 72 - 80